From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:57:13 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 v5] KB9202: Add NAND support In-Reply-To: <20090624205136.GA20155@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> References: <20090515221544.GF7923@traven> <200906040853.10424.sr@denx.de> <20090604174925.GB3806@darwin> <200906042008.04615.sr@denx.de> <20090604185024.GB4398@darwin> <20090604190858.AEB7D832E416@gemini.denx.de> <20090611184654.GB3627@darwin> <20090623211940.GC26927@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> <20090624152305.GA30563@darwin> <20090624205136.GA20155@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20090712195713.GD1686@game.jcrosoft.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 15:51 Wed 24 Jun , Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:23:05PM +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > Add NAND support for the KwikByte KB9202 > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke > > > > --- > > > > El Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:19:40PM -0500 Scott Wood ha dit: > > > > > I get conflicts in kb9202.h. Is this against an arch tree, or does it > > > need to be respun? > > > > The previous patches were against v2009-03, as i had problems > > building the current git head for the kb9202 when i started working on > > the patch. Did you apply the first patch of this series when you got > > the conflict? This patch is based on the current HEAD. > > No - if it depends on other patches that go through an arch tree, then this > patch should go through that tree as well. > > Acked-by: Scott Wood Scott I've not follow this patch but for the arm part it's looks fine so I'll let you handle Best Regards, J.