From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Roese Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:36:39 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 v6] Make libgcc inclusion from common Makefile overridable by platform config file In-Reply-To: <20090712102932.6247D832E416@gemini.denx.de> References: <1247081808-31514-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <200907121002.46516.sr@denx.de> <20090712102932.6247D832E416@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <200907130936.39799.sr@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Wolfgang, On Sunday 12 July 2009 12:29:32 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > Any idea why this still happens *with* libgcc patches? Any idea how to > > > fix this? Add __umoddi3 and __udivdi3 to libgcc patch, too? > > > > I have to admit that I'm not sure why this is the case. But I suggest > > that you take a look at Simon's patch sent to the list a few days ago: > > > > [PATCH 5/8]: Use do_div from div64.h for vsprintf > > > > This should fix this issue. > > It will hush up the current errors, but that's actually a bad thing > here - the errors are an indication that Jean-Christophe's patch > might not be working as it is supposed to. >From my point of view those two patches address different issues. I just noticed that Simon's patch solved some of the current ARM toolchain problems as well. That's why I referred to it. So I think that regardless of this ARM libgcc discussion, we should apply Simons patch "[PATCH 5/8]: Use do_div from div64.h for vsprintf" as it uses the common do_div() implementation instead of a local version. Best regards, Stefan ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de =====================================================================