public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Piotr Zięcik" <kosmo@semihalf.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] eth_receive(): Do not assume that caller always wants full packet.
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:51:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907161151.59353.kosmo@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907151105.45474.vapier@gentoo.org>

Wednesday 15 July 2009 17:05:44 Mike Frysinger napisa?(a):
> On Tuesday 14 July 2009 04:08:35 Piotr Ziecik wrote:
> > When packets arrive on the interface that are larger than the buffer
> > being passed to U-Boot from a standalone application, then the
> > eth_receive() returns -1 and leaves the packet saved. The next call to
> > eth_receive() will find that same packet and can fail for the exact same
> > reason. A typical scenario is the loader doing ARP with a buffer of 66
> > bytes. The end result is that the ARP will fail and the loader panics.
> >
> > This patch fixes above problem by allowing partial packet read.
>
> seems like it could easily introduce incorrect behavior in existing
> applications.  the code also sounds a bit risky ... your change would mean
> people could read the leading part, but the rest is lost ?

Yes. The patch allows read only first n bytes from packet. The rest is 
discaded, if buffer is too small. This behaviour is similar to Linux recv() 
function. I do not see why we have to force application to prepare 1,5kB 
buffer for received packets when for example it waits for ARP reply.

> probably better to add a new function with explicit semantics --
> eth_receive_partial() or something.

API uses simple open, read/write, close model. The eth_receive() function is 
used by API read() call on network device. I do not see space here another 
function.

-- 
Best regards,
Piotr Ziecik

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-16  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-14  8:08 [U-Boot] [PATCH] eth_receive(): Do not assume that caller always wants full packet Piotr Ziecik
2009-07-15 15:05 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-16  9:51   ` Piotr Zięcik [this message]
2009-07-16 12:39     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-16 13:32       ` Piotr Zięcik
2009-07-16 15:08       ` Marcel Moolenaar
2009-07-16 15:39         ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-16 16:42           ` Marcel Moolenaar
2009-07-17 20:11             ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-16 17:32   ` Ben Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200907161151.59353.kosmo@semihalf.com \
    --to=kosmo@semihalf.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox