From: "Piotr Zięcik" <kosmo@semihalf.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] eth_receive(): Do not assume that caller always wants full packet.
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:51:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907161151.59353.kosmo@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907151105.45474.vapier@gentoo.org>
Wednesday 15 July 2009 17:05:44 Mike Frysinger napisa?(a):
> On Tuesday 14 July 2009 04:08:35 Piotr Ziecik wrote:
> > When packets arrive on the interface that are larger than the buffer
> > being passed to U-Boot from a standalone application, then the
> > eth_receive() returns -1 and leaves the packet saved. The next call to
> > eth_receive() will find that same packet and can fail for the exact same
> > reason. A typical scenario is the loader doing ARP with a buffer of 66
> > bytes. The end result is that the ARP will fail and the loader panics.
> >
> > This patch fixes above problem by allowing partial packet read.
>
> seems like it could easily introduce incorrect behavior in existing
> applications. the code also sounds a bit risky ... your change would mean
> people could read the leading part, but the rest is lost ?
Yes. The patch allows read only first n bytes from packet. The rest is
discaded, if buffer is too small. This behaviour is similar to Linux recv()
function. I do not see why we have to force application to prepare 1,5kB
buffer for received packets when for example it waits for ARP reply.
> probably better to add a new function with explicit semantics --
> eth_receive_partial() or something.
API uses simple open, read/write, close model. The eth_receive() function is
used by API read() call on network device. I do not see space here another
function.
--
Best regards,
Piotr Ziecik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-16 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-14 8:08 [U-Boot] [PATCH] eth_receive(): Do not assume that caller always wants full packet Piotr Ziecik
2009-07-15 15:05 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-16 9:51 ` Piotr Zięcik [this message]
2009-07-16 12:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-16 13:32 ` Piotr Zięcik
2009-07-16 15:08 ` Marcel Moolenaar
2009-07-16 15:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-16 16:42 ` Marcel Moolenaar
2009-07-17 20:11 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-16 17:32 ` Ben Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907161151.59353.kosmo@semihalf.com \
--to=kosmo@semihalf.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox