From: "Piotr Zięcik" <kosmo@semihalf.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] eth_receive(): Do not assume that caller always wants full packet.
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:32:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907161532.49054.kosmo@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090716123959.F3E34832E416@gemini.denx.de>
Thursday 16 July 2009 14:39:59 Wolfgang Denk napisa?(a):
>
> But recv() is on another level. Here we are dealing with receiving raw
> ethernet frames.
>
I think that there is an analogy. Both function could be used for receiving
_frames_. eth_receive() for ethernet frames and Linux recv() for UDP frames.
> > function. I do not see why we have to force application to prepare 1,5kB
> > buffer for received packets when for example it waits for ARP reply.
>
> Come on - what exactly is the extra effort you have to spend to
> prepare a bigger buffer?
>
Maybe I have used bad example. When application prepares a buffer
and chooses it's size to be less than interface MTU it means that application
is not able to process larger packets. U-Boot should not expect that simple
application using API is able to handle every possible case (for example
9k packets on gigabyte ethernet).
--
Pozdrawiam.
Piotr Zi?cik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-16 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-14 8:08 [U-Boot] [PATCH] eth_receive(): Do not assume that caller always wants full packet Piotr Ziecik
2009-07-15 15:05 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-07-16 9:51 ` Piotr Zięcik
2009-07-16 12:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-16 13:32 ` Piotr Zięcik [this message]
2009-07-16 15:08 ` Marcel Moolenaar
2009-07-16 15:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-16 16:42 ` Marcel Moolenaar
2009-07-17 20:11 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-07-16 17:32 ` Ben Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907161532.49054.kosmo@semihalf.com \
--to=kosmo@semihalf.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox