From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@gnudd.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:00:58 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] http client?
In-Reply-To: <200907221734.57623.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
References: <200907221734.57623.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
	<BLU127-DAV686E79B5BF3A896935555A91B0@phx.gbl>
	<200907221651.45645.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
	<4A677C45.9050700@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090722220058.GA9737@mail.gnudd.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

> When I looked at the RFC data
> it appears that the overhead of IP fragmentation and reassembly (which does 
> add overhead as the number of gateways increases) may be worth the time...

Just tried it: U-Boot doesn't support reassembly, it seems.

net.c confirms it:

                /* Can't deal with fragments */
                if (ip->ip_off & htons(IP_OFFS | IP_FLAGS_MFRAG)) {
                        return;
                }

I don't think it's worth adding.

/alessandro