From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:09:35 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OneNAND: S5PC100 OneNAND IPL support
In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240907232228r615c8a2bv600a6c47b8b5b7de@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090721005544.GA14191@july>
	<20090723224229.GB28766@game.jcrosoft.org>
	<9c9fda240907232228r615c8a2bv600a6c47b8b5b7de@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090727200935.GE5259@game.jcrosoft.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 14:28 Fri 24 Jul     , Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Jean-Christophe
> PLAGNIOL-VILLARD<plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> wrote:
> > On 09:55 Tue 21 Jul ? ? , Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >> S5PC100 has own OneNAND controller and has different interface.
> >> OneNAND IPL use it to S5PC100 board.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> > is there any better than put soc specific code in generic implementatioN
> >
> 
> I hope so. only s3c64xx series and s5pc100 use own OneNAND controller.
> I also don't understand why need these controller. The OneNAND has its
> own controller at chips already.
I known
so what do you propose?

Best Regards,
J.