From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@gnudd.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] net: defragment IP packets
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:02:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090731140214.GA18461@mail.gnudd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907310940.37682.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
>> Is the target replying to all pings?
>
> Yes. And I can see the same in wireshark.
Ah. I see. Strange...
>> > What is missing in the reassembly code (that is described in RFC815)
>> > is the timer. (quote from the RFC):
>> > --------------
>> > The final part of the algorithm is some sort of timer based
>> > mechanism which decrements the time to live field of each partially
>> > reassembled datagram, so that incomplete datagrams which have outlived
>> > their usefulness can be detected and deleted.
>> > --------------
>>
>> But I reassemble one packet only, so I don't need to timeout
>> partly-filled packets to recover memory.
>
> But it is for the state that you described - the user cntr-C a current
> transfer, and the reassembly algorithm doesn't know to throw away a partially
> accepted packet, when things are cancelled...
No, it's not like that. The old instance of the TFTP server resends
the last packet of the aborted xfer, while the new server sends the new
packet. Both packets are new, they just come as intermixed fragments.
And none survives as there is only one reassembly buffer. Or something
like that, but both are fresh fragmented packets, no timeout would solve
this sporadic problem.
It seems to me that if we want a secure defagment system (one that can
be use to net-boot production systems in hostile networks), it's
going to be too complex. It could work well, however, as a faster
tool for the interactive developer.
/alessandro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-31 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-30 9:02 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] Defragment IP packets Alessandro Rubini
2009-07-30 9:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] net: defragment " Alessandro Rubini
2009-07-30 9:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] tftp: get the tftp block size from config file and from the environment Alessandro Rubini
2009-07-30 9:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] arm nomadik: select defrag and 4k tftp block size Alessandro Rubini
[not found] ` <8124a390e4cbcfee291c7583a585c9d030aadf7a.1248943812.git.rubini @unipv.it>
2009-07-30 9:25 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 V2] tftp: get tftpblocksize from cfg file and env Alessandro Rubini
[not found] ` <7b8035d1-8543-4b85-ba00-ac21ff1a60df@lists.denx.de>
2009-07-30 23:15 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] net: defragment IP packets Robin Getz
2009-07-31 7:46 ` Alessandro Rubini
2009-07-31 11:50 ` Robin Getz
2009-07-31 12:16 ` Alessandro Rubini
2009-07-31 13:40 ` Robin Getz
2009-07-31 14:02 ` Alessandro Rubini [this message]
2009-07-31 15:14 ` Robin Getz
2009-07-31 15:44 ` Alessandro Rubini
2009-07-31 15:33 ` Robin Getz
2009-08-05 16:59 ` Robin Getz
2009-08-05 17:18 ` Alessandro Rubini
2009-08-05 17:24 ` Ben Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090731140214.GA18461@mail.gnudd.com \
--to=rubini-list@gnudd.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox