From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] e1000: fix PCI memory addressing
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:17:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090822131718.36823833DBD2@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A8FEA69.9080408@freescale.com>
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message <4A8FEA69.9080408@freescale.com> you wrote:
>
> > Configuring for MVBC_P board...
> > e1000.c: In function 'e1000_transmit':
> > e1000.c:5019: warning: passing argument 1 of 'virt_to_phys' discards
> > qualifiers from pointer target type
>
> I can't reproduce this problem.
...
> $ ${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc --version
> powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc (Sourcery G++ Lite 4.3-74) 4.3.2
I used ELDK 4.2 (gcc-4.2.2).
> If you look at the definition of virt_to_bus, you'll see that I added a
> pointer cast specifically to address this warning:
Well, are you aware how this simple statement gets expanded by the
preprocessor?
Out of
txp->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(virt_to_bus(hw->pdev, packet));
becomes:
txp->buffer_addr = (__builtin_constant_p((__u64)((pci_hose_phys_to_bus(pci_bus_to_hose(((((hw->pdev)) >> 16) & 0xff)), (virt_to_phys(((void *) (packet)))), (0x00000000))))) ? ((__u64)( (__u64)(((__u64)(((pci_hose_phys_to_bus(pci_bus_to_hose(((((hw->pdev)) >> 16) & 0xff)), (virt_to_phys(((void *) (packet)))), (0x00000000))))) & (__u64)0x00000000000000ffULL) << 56) | (__u64)(((__u64)(((pci_hose_phys_to_bus(pci_bus_to_hose(((((hw->pdev)) >> 16) & 0xff)), (virt_to_phys(((void *) (packet)))), (0x00000000))))) & (__u64)0x000000000000ff00ULL) << 40) | (__u64)(((__u64)(((pci_hose_phys_to_bus(pci_bus_to_hose(((((hw->pdev)) >> 16) & 0xff)), (virt_to_phys(((void *) (packet)))), (0x00000000))))) & (__u64)0x0000000000ff0000ULL) << 24) | (__u64)(((__u64)(((pci_hose_phys_to_bus(pci_bus_to_hose(((((hw->pdev)) >> 16) & 0xff)), (virt_to_phys(((void *) (packet)))), (0x00000000))))) & (__u64)0x00000000ff000000ULL) << 8) | (__u64)(((__u64)(((pci_hose_phys_to_bus(pci_bus_to_hose(((((hw->pdev)) >>
16) & 0xff)), (virt_to_phys(((void *) (packet)))), (0x00000000))))) & (__u64)0x000000ff00000000ULL) >> 8) | (__u64)(((__u64)(((pci_hose_phys_to_bus(pci_bus_to_hose(((((hw->pdev)) >> 16) & 0xff)), (virt_to_phys(((void *) (packet)))), (0x00000000))))) & (__u64)0x0000ff0000000000ULL) >> 24) | (__u64)(((__u64)(((pci_hose_phys_to_bus(pci_bus_to_hose(((((hw->pdev)) >> 16) & 0xff)), (virt_to_phys(((void *) (packet)))), (0x00000000))))) & (__u64)0x00ff000000000000ULL) >> 40) | (__u64)(((__u64)(((pci_hose_phys_to_bus(pci_bus_to_hose(((((hw->pdev)) >> 16) & 0xff)), (virt_to_phys(((void *) (packet)))), (0x00000000))))) & (__u64)0xff00000000000000ULL) >> 56) )) : __fswab64(((pci_hose_phys_to_bus(pci_bus_to_hose(((((hw->pdev)) >> 16) & 0xff)), (virt_to_phys(((void *) (packet)))), (0x00000000))))));
I take my hat off to you if you manage to understand the consequences
and results of all this casting going on here.
> #define virt_to_bus(devno, v) pci_virt_to_mem(devno, (void *) (v))
Also, I have to admit that I really dislike such casts as they just
suppress compiler warnings which are usually valuable - I'd rather
see you fixing the original problem (i. e. the type
incompatibilities).
> If I remove the (void *) cast, I get this:
>
> e1000.c: In function 'e1000_transmit':
> e1000.c:5019: warning: passing argument 1 of 'virt_to_phys' discards
> qualifiers from pointer target type
>
> So somehow, you're compiler is ignoring the "(void *)".
I would not go so far to say it is ignoring it. Let's say this cast
is insufficient (or simply the wrong approach) to silence the compiler.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"Maintain an awareness for contribution -- to your schedule, your
project, our company." - A Group of Employees
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-22 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-17 20:55 [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] e1000: fix PCI memory addressing Timur Tabi
2009-08-17 20:57 ` Timur Tabi
2009-08-17 23:25 ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-21 6:56 ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-21 16:59 ` Ben Warren
2009-08-22 9:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-22 11:40 ` Timur Tabi
2009-08-22 11:49 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-22 12:54 ` Timur Tabi
2009-08-22 13:17 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2009-08-24 15:30 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090822131718.36823833DBD2@gemini.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox