From: Matt Waddel <mwaddel@control4.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] MTD:NAND: ADD new ECC mode NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:59:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909011359.52037.mwaddel@control4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9D73AD.6060506@freescale.com>
Hi Scott and Sandeep,
As long as we're looking at these patches again I had a question about
patch 1 of 2 in this series.
The following part of the patch added a definition for:
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first
but since there aren't any "break" statements until "case NAND_ECC_SOFT:"
it looks like the chip->ecc.read_page definition ends up being set to:
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_swecc.
Maybe this is explains why things seem to be working???
Best regards,
Matt
+ case NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST:
+ /* Similar to NAND_ECC_HW, but a separate read_page handle */
+ if (!chip->ecc.calculate || !chip->ecc.correct ||
+ !chip->ecc.hwctl) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "No ECC functions supplied, "
+ "Hardware ECC not possible\n");
+ BUG();
+ }
+ if (!chip->ecc.read_page)
+ chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
+
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 01:19:09 pm Scott Wood wrote:
> Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
> >> John Rigby wrote:
> >>> Sorry for the late comments. We have been trying to use this code with
> >>> the associated davinci 4-bit ecc patches and have some questions
> > We use this internally and it works. Are you having any issues because we don't see any!!
>
> Calm down, just because it works doesn't mean nobody should ask
> questions about the code.
>
> >>> Here you calculate ecc then never use the result?
> >> Hmm, that looks wrong, both here and in the davinci driver. Are the two
> >> calls to nand_davinci_4bit_readecc reading different things? Does the
> >> calculate function have any side effects beyond producing data that is
> >> never used?
> > Have you reads the patch description. Maybe that might help a bit
> >
> > This patch adds the new mode NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST in the nand code to
> > support 4-bit ECC on TI DaVinci devices with large page (up to 2K) NAND
> > chips. This ECC mode is similar to NAND_ECC_HW, with the exception of
> > read_page API that first reads the OOB area, reads the data in chunks,
> > feeds the ECC from OOB area to the ECC hw engine and perform any
> > correction on the data as per the ECC status reported by the engine.
>
> Yes, I've read that. That doesn't explain why calculate_ecc is
> producing data, *after* everything has been read, that is never consumed
> by anything (hardware or software) AFAICT. It doesn't explain why the
> "generic" code is passing NULL to ecc.correct.
>
> -Scott
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7081825318460577925@unknownmsgid>
2009-09-01 15:22 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] MTD:NAND: ADD new ECC mode NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST John Rigby
2009-09-01 15:36 ` Scott Wood
2009-09-01 16:03 ` Paulraj, Sandeep
2009-09-01 16:31 ` John Rigby
[not found] ` <0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5D9217B3B7@dlee01.ent.ti.com>
2009-09-01 16:55 ` John Rigby
2009-09-01 19:19 ` Scott Wood
2009-09-01 19:59 ` Matt Waddel [this message]
2009-09-01 20:06 ` Scott Wood
2009-08-18 16:00 Scott Wood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-11 22:34 Scott Wood
2009-08-12 11:48 ` Paulraj, Sandeep
2009-08-12 16:11 ` Scott Wood
[not found] ` <0554BEF07D437848AF01B9C9B5F0BC5D7C628A5C@dlee01.ent.ti.com>
2009-08-12 17:11 ` Scott Wood
2009-08-14 14:03 ` Paulraj, Sandeep
2009-08-11 22:17 Scott Wood
2009-08-10 17:27 s-paulraj at dal.design.ti.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909011359.52037.mwaddel@control4.com \
--to=mwaddel@control4.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox