From: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 4/4]: arm: Define test_and_set_bit and test_and_clear bit for ARM
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 08:26:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090907082658.2cbbf114@marrow.netinsight.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252099679.4786.13.camel@jjw-linux>
Hi Justin!
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:27:59 -0400
Justin Waters <justin.waters@timesys.com> wrote:
> I found a slight problem with this section of the patch:
>
> On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 03:10 -0400, Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h b/include/asm-arm/bitops.h
> > index 854e225..3c7b00c 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-arm/bitops.h
> > @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> >
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > +#include <asm/proc/system.h>
> > +
>
> It causes a compiler error on the arm926ejs platform:
>
> In file included from cpu.c:34:
> /home/justin/git/u-boot/include/asm/system.h: At top level:
> /home/justin/git/u-boot/include/asm/system.h:71: error: expected
> identifier or '(' before 'asm'
>
> I did some digging, and it looks like set_cr() is implemented by both
> asm-arm/system.h and asm-arm/proc-armv/system.h. One implements the
> function as a macro, while the other uses a standard C function, hence
> the weird error message. The conflict occurs in cpu/arm926ejs/cpu.c.
You are right, but I believe this was fixed an earlier patch, "[PATCH]
Remove duplicate set_cr" [1], which is in the ARM tree. I guess that
one hasn't shown up in Wolfgangs repository yet, so this series must be
applied to the ARM tree for now.
Thanks for testing!
// Simon
[1] http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=commit;h=f3d4f8870e69e0fd177397778d97d0751bbd020a
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-07 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-24 7:06 [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/4]: bitops cleanup and fixes Simon Kagstrom
2009-08-24 7:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/4]: Move __set/clear_bit from ubifs.h to bitops.h Simon Kagstrom
2009-09-15 20:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-24 7:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/4]: arm: Make arm bitops endianness-independent Simon Kagstrom
2009-09-15 20:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-24 7:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4]: Define ffs/fls for all architectures Simon Kagstrom
2009-09-15 20:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-16 19:19 ` Stefan Roese
2009-09-17 6:45 ` Simon Kagstrom
2009-09-17 6:56 ` Stefan Roese
2009-09-17 7:13 ` Simon Kagstrom
2009-09-17 7:19 ` Stefan Roese
2009-08-24 7:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 4/4]: arm: Define test_and_set_bit and test_and_clear bit for ARM Simon Kagstrom
2009-09-04 21:27 ` Justin Waters
2009-09-06 14:59 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-09-07 6:26 ` Simon Kagstrom [this message]
2009-09-15 20:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-08-31 9:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/4]: bitops cleanup and fixes Simon Kagstrom
2009-09-04 20:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-05 11:37 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-09-06 20:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-06 23:01 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090907082658.2cbbf114@marrow.netinsight.se \
--to=simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox