public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] PPC440GX: DDR ECC init time.
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:23:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909071623.22541.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD35CD1F8085945B597F80EEC8942130348D9E9@exc01.bk.prodrive.nl>

On Monday 07 September 2009 15:57:19 Wouter Eckhardt wrote:
> Well, I've been trying to work this into my U-Boot. I haven't succeeded
> so far. Basically, the cache stuff in 4xx_spd_ddr2.c consists of setting
> up a TLB without the CACHE_INHIBITED bit and then using some cache
> instructions to fill up memory. That's what I've been trying to do, but
> my call to change_tlb() hangs because of the invalidate_dcache() call
> (bad trap exceptions). What could be going on here?
> 
> I'll try and set up the DDR TLB dynamically instead of statically (in
> init.S) and see if I can get that working.

Yes. That's what I would do as well.
 
> By the way, I've also stumbled upon some other VERY strange behavior. If
> I leave the ecc_init() in its original state and just add in a puts(" ")
> call at the beginning of the function, ECC generation is finished VERY
> quickly. What influence could adding the puts() call possibly have on
> the speed of generating ECC values in DDR?

That's strange indeed. I suspect a problem in the code then. Try looking at 
the generated assembler code and/or debug with an BDI2000/3000.

Cheers,
Stefan

--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich,  Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-07 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-04 12:34 [U-Boot] PPC440GX: DDR ECC init time Wouter Eckhardt
2009-09-04 12:50 ` Stefan Roese
2009-09-04 13:06   ` Wouter Eckhardt
2009-09-04 13:13     ` Stefan Roese
2009-09-07 13:57       ` Wouter Eckhardt
2009-09-07 14:23         ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2009-09-08  9:19           ` Felix Radensky
2009-09-08  9:49             ` Stefan Roese
2009-09-08 10:05               ` Felix Radensky
2009-09-08 11:04                 ` Stefan Roese
2009-09-08 15:19               ` Grant Erickson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200909071623.22541.sr@denx.de \
    --to=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox