From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olof Johansson Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:33:42 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Clean up whitespace in mux configs In-Reply-To: <4ABF2376.5080408@googlemail.com> References: <20090922225314.GA16136@lixom.net> <4ABF2376.5080408@googlemail.com> Message-ID: <20090927143342.GA7850@lixom.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:33:58AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote: > Olof Johansson wrote: >> Switch from space-based indentation to tab-based in mux configs, as pointed >> out by WD at: > > You have only two options here: Violate space/tab rule or 80 char rule. > We had this discussion with Wolfgang already in the past ;) Haha, great. > Last time we had: > > ... > [So Jan 25 2009] [18:50:28] wdenk: Regarding your code comments > in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-January/046090.html: > [So Jan 25 2009] [18:51:34] wdenk: Regarding MUX indent: > normally yes, but ... > [So Jan 25 2009] [18:51:59] ...you have too long lines, then. I > know > [So Jan 25 2009] [18:52:49] wdenk: ... we tried several > formatting options, and jkridner converted one MUX file with beginning > TABs. The result wasn't readable better > [So Jan 25 2009] [18:53:34] I'll not fight about this one. > ... > > So last time we stayed with space instead of tab and have 80 char fine. > > If we want to switch now to break 80 chars (and this patch does so) but > have no spaces any more, I'm fine with it. Just want to give some > history. Heh. Personally I don't mind the occasional breakage of the 80 character rule, especially for header files like these that don't affect code flow readability. But I don't care either way, I just reformatted it on request. If the decision goes the other way I can repost the other patch that went on top of this so it still applies. -Olof