From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] relocation: Do not relocate NULL pointers.
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:58:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091006085853.949284C021@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1254784811.24664.968.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message <1254784811.24664.968.camel@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
>
> > 1. is just a small fix the the existing asm reloc functions. Pretty much
> > ready but needs some linker tweeks it seems. No idea if other
> > boards than 85xx also needs a linker tweak or not.
>
> It looks like 85xx is the only arch that needed linker script tweaks. I
> just submitted some patches a bit ago.
I think this code is too complex. Eventually we could hard-wire
something like ". = 0x40000" or similar for a fixed location of the
(pre-relocation) bss on all 85xx/86xx systems.
> > 2. is 1 in C and some common supporting asm for ppc. Any idea were
> > to put common asm files for ppc? I was hoping I could get away with
> > just 83xx and the rest could be done later by interested parties?
>
> Assuming the 85xx link script changes are accepted, what's the gameplan
> now? #1 is pretty trivial (the original patch that spawned this thread
> with slight tweaks) and should be easy to get in this merge window.
> That would get us to the point that relocation is fully functional,
> including non-relocation of NULL pointers.
I think this is a nice and realistic goal for the current release.
> #2 looks more involved and prone to errors as it requires some shuffling
> of registers in assembly for all architectures. Are we aiming for
> getting #2 across all architectures in this window? I should be able to
> implement and test it on 85xx, 86xx, and 44x, and Jocke's tested on
> 83xx. I don't think I could do the rest of the arches by the end of
> this week though. Any other takers? Save it for the next merge window?
I guess this is for next version.
Um... jut to be sure - I understand that by "all architectures" above
you actually mean "all Power architecture CPU families", i. e. you
don't include the needed cleanup for ARM, MIPs, etc. here (yet) ?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
365 Days of drinking Lo-Cal beer. 1 Lite-year
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-23 11:51 [U-Boot] [PATCH] relocation: Do not relocate NULL pointers Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-23 12:17 ` Peter Tyser
2009-09-23 12:25 ` Stefan Roese
2009-09-23 12:30 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-23 12:57 ` Peter Tyser
2009-09-23 16:53 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-23 18:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-27 13:15 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-27 13:52 ` Graeme Russ
2009-09-27 16:18 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-27 23:23 ` Graeme Russ
2009-09-28 7:28 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-28 4:31 ` Peter Tyser
2009-09-28 7:34 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-28 12:45 ` Peter Tyser
2009-09-28 13:15 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-28 14:29 ` Peter Tyser
2009-09-28 14:47 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-28 14:41 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-28 15:08 ` Peter Tyser
2009-09-28 15:23 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-09-28 15:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-10-03 8:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <OF3474ED49.C18DA041-ONC1257 <20091003142823.F037D832E408@gemini.denx.de>
2009-10-03 9:28 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-10-03 12:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-10-03 13:34 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-10-03 13:45 ` Peter Tyser
2009-10-03 14:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-10-03 15:09 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-10-03 19:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-10-05 23:20 ` Peter Tyser
2009-10-06 8:58 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2009-10-06 10:56 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-10-05 20:07 ` Peter Tyser
2009-10-05 21:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-10-06 17:12 ` Scott Wood
2009-10-06 17:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-23 12:24 ` Stefan Roese
2009-09-23 12:33 ` Joakim Tjernlund
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-07 23:42 Joakim Tjernlund
2009-10-07 23:49 ` Peter Tyser
2009-10-08 0:03 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-10-08 0:03 Joakim Tjernlund
2009-10-08 7:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-10-08 8:56 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-10-08 12:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-10-08 13:35 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2009-10-08 13:40 ` Peter Tyser
2009-10-08 22:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091006085853.949284C021@gemini.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox