From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] part_dos: check status flags of partitions
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:50:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091018205037.ED9DA3F6CE@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090928100400.GY9361@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Dear Daniel Mack,
In message <20090928100400.GY9361@buzzloop.caiaq.de> you wrote:
> The current fatload code has a problem together with the way the DOS
> partition parser is implemented.
>
> This hit me when I tried to load a file from a USB stick which had no
> partition table but a FAT16 directly written to the first sector.
>
> With such an environment, get_partition_info_extended() still finds a
> valid partition at the first sector since the 0x55aa magic is valid for
> both the MBR and the FAT boot sector.
>
> As a result, part_offset in fs/fat/fat.c is then set to some ridiculous
> value and the code searching for the directory entry gets lots in an
> endless loop.
>
> The fix is quite simple though - we just need to check the status field
> of the partitions more stricly. According to the specs, it may only
> contain 0x00 and 0x80. If get_partition_info() fails for this case, the
> fatload code falls back to the assumption that there is no partition
> table and does the right thing then.
>
> Please consider applying the following patch.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> From 381a85bf04adc228cc70e8fa7af899a6dbf07e42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:40:38 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] part_dos: check status flags of partitions
>
> Only read partitions which have 0x00 or 0x80 set in their status field.
> All others are invalid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> ---
> disk/part_dos.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Digital computers are themselves more complex than most things people
build: They have very large numbers of states. This makes conceiving,
describing, and testing them hard. Software systems have orders-of-
magnitude more states than computers do. - Fred Brooks, Jr.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-18 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-28 10:04 [U-Boot] [PATCH] part_dos: check status flags of partitions Daniel Mack
2009-10-03 5:05 ` Daniel Mack
2009-10-03 23:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-10-18 20:50 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091018205037.ED9DA3F6CE@gemini.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox