From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:28:19 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] CAN console In-Reply-To: <4AE593F3.3030608@arcor.de> References: <4AE55BB2.6090608@arcor.de> <200910260726.59949.vapier@gentoo.org> <4AE593F3.3030608@arcor.de> Message-ID: <200910260828.20144.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Monday 26 October 2009 08:20:03 Matthias Wei?er wrote: > Mike Frysinger schrieb: > > you would rather write a driver that is specific to one CAN hardware ? > > In general? No, I wouldn't. I would use a given CAN driver framework > where I put my CAN driver in. > > In this specific case: I think I would, as there is currently no CAN > framework available in u-boot. my point was more that a common driver would probably be more likely to be accepted, but this leads me to the next point ... > Is there any chance that the stuff posted by miaofng will be available > in u-boot-next? no idea, i'm not the maintainer. just part of the peanut gallery. -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20091026/a1577066/attachment.pgp