From: Wolfgang Wegner <wolfgang@leila.ping.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] non-blocking flash functions - is this possible/acceptable?
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:24:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091027152451.GC3216@leila.ping.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE6F3D5.5060403@ge.com>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:21:25AM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Wolfgang Wegner wrote:
> >Is such a use case generally acceptable in U-Boot, and if so,
>
> I'll defer to Wolfgang Denk, Stefan Roese, (Scott Wood?), and others for
> this half.
:-)
> >anybody have an idea how to implement those without all this duplicate
> >code?
>
> Move the code to the non-blocking functions (which you have already
> done), and then implement the blocking versions as wrappers that simply
> call the non-blocking write followed by a loop calling
> flash_status_check_nb() until the write is complete. For erase, you
> would need a loop to do the multi-sector erase as multiple non-blocking
> + wait operations.
I will try this and see if it looks clean after implementing.
Thanks for the hint.
Regards,
Wolfgang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 12:51 [U-Boot] non-blocking flash functions - is this possible/acceptable? Wolfgang Wegner
2009-10-27 13:21 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-10-27 14:03 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-10-27 15:22 ` Wolfgang Wegner
2009-10-27 15:57 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-10-27 15:24 ` Wolfgang Wegner [this message]
2009-10-27 18:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-10-30 14:48 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Implementation of non-blocking flash write/erase/status check functions Wolfgang Wegner
2009-10-30 15:02 ` Wolfgang Wegner
2009-10-30 18:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-11-02 16:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] " Wolfgang Wegner
2009-11-02 16:33 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Implementation of " Wolfgang Wegner
2009-12-09 16:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC v2] " Wolfgang Wegner
2010-01-22 10:03 ` Wolfgang Wegner
2010-01-22 12:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-01-25 8:35 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091027152451.GC3216@leila.ping.de \
--to=wolfgang@leila.ping.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox