From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC 4/4] MXC: Reorganize 16 bit nand detection.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:12:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091109201227.GA4312@loki.buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e20f8213d5fff95e8a9d89ba83eed477a07ae1be.1257676418.git.lilja.magnus@gmail.com>
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Magnus Lilja wrote:
> Alternative solution for supporting 16 bit NAND detection for the
> i.MX27 and i.MX31 SoCs. This moves the SoC specific code to the SoC header
> file leaving mxc_nand.c free from #ifdef's (in this respect).
OTOH, it moves more NAND stuff out of the NAND driver.
I guess it depends on how many more such alternatives you think will be
added in the future.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> index 3e4254a..45d0024 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> @@ -808,8 +808,6 @@ static void mxc_nand_command(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned command,
>
> int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *this)
> {
> - struct system_control_regs *sc_regs =
> - (struct system_control_regs *)IMX_SYSTEM_CTL_BASE;
> struct mtd_info *mtd;
> uint16_t tmp;
> int err = 0;
> @@ -871,15 +869,9 @@ int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *this)
> writew(0x4, &host->regs->nfc_wrprot);
>
> /* NAND bus width determines access funtions used by upper layer */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MX27
> - if (readl(&sc_regs->fmcr) & NF_16BIT_SEL)
> - this->options |= NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_MX31)
> - if (readl(&sc_regs->rcsr) & CCM_RCSR_NF16B)
> + if (mxc_nand_is_16bit())
> this->options |= NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
> -#else
> -#warning "No autodetection of 8/16 bit NAND"
> -#endif
> +
> host->pagesize_2k = 0;
>
> return err;
> diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h
> index d36a6da..b88fe51 100644
> --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h
> +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h
> @@ -516,4 +516,17 @@ struct iim_regs {
> #define IIM0_SCC_KEY 11
> #define IIM1_SUID 1
>
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +static inline int mxc_nand_is_16bit(void)
> +{
> + struct system_control_regs *sc_regs =
> + (struct system_control_regs *)IMX_SYSTEM_CTL_BASE;
> +
> + if (readl(&sc_regs->rcsr) & CCM_RCSR_NF16B)
> + return 1;
> + else
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* _IMX_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-mx31/mx31-regs.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-mx31/mx31-regs.h
> index 86c9975..613c632 100644
> --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-mx31/mx31-regs.h
> +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-mx31/mx31-regs.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,19 @@ struct system_control_regs {
> #define CCM_RCSR_NF16B (1 << 31)
> #define CCM_RCSR_NFMS (1 << 30)
>
> +#include <asm/io.h>
> +
> +static inline int mxc_nand_is_16bit(void)
> +{
> + struct system_control_regs *sc_regs =
> + (struct system_control_regs *)IMX_SYSTEM_CTL_BASE;
> +
> + if (readl(&sc_regs->rcsr) & CCM_RCSR_NF16B)
> + return 1;
> + else
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #endif
It looks like you put the MX31 version in the MX27 file as well...
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-08 10:55 [U-Boot] [RFC 0/4] MXC: Add NAND support for i.MX31 Magnus Lilja
2009-11-08 10:55 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 1/4] MX31: Add struct definition for clock control module in i.MX31 Magnus Lilja
2009-11-08 10:55 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 2/4] mxc_nand: Update driver to work with i.MX31 Magnus Lilja
2009-11-08 10:55 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 3/4] MX31: Activate NAND support for i.MX31 Litekit board Magnus Lilja
2009-11-08 10:55 ` [U-Boot] [RFC 4/4] MXC: Reorganize 16 bit nand detection Magnus Lilja
2009-11-09 20:12 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2009-11-10 20:43 ` Magnus Lilja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091109201227.GA4312@loki.buserror.net \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox