From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx fix unstable 440EPx bootstrap options
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:39:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003021439.53180.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1267120817-30716-1-git-send-email-rsarmah@appliedmicro.com>
On Thursday 25 February 2010 19:00:17 Rupjyoti Sarmah wrote:
> 440EPx fixed bootstrap options A, B, D, and E sets PLL FWDVA to a value =
> 1. This results in the PLLOUTB being greater than the CPU clock frequency
> resulting unstable 440EPx operation resulting in various software hang
> conditions.
Thanks. Sorry for the late review. I still have some minor mostly coding style
related issues. Please see below.
> Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@appliedmicro.com>
> Acked-by : Victor Gallardo <vgallardo@appliedmicro.com>
> ---
> cpu/ppc4xx/cpu_init.c | 67
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 62
> insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpu/ppc4xx/cpu_init.c b/cpu/ppc4xx/cpu_init.c
> index ccd9993..9b7caff 100644
> --- a/cpu/ppc4xx/cpu_init.c
> +++ b/cpu/ppc4xx/cpu_init.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_PLL_RECONFIG
> #define CONFIG_SYS_PLL_RECONFIG 0
> #endif
> +#define BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_A 0x00000000
> +#define BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_B 0x00000001
> +#define BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_D 0x00000003
> +#define BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_E 0x00000004
Please move these defines into a header. Are they 440EPx specific? Or common for all
4xx variants? If 440EPx specific I suggest to move them to include/ppc440.h. If
common then include/ppc4xx.h please.
> void reconfigure_pll(u32 new_cpu_freq)
> {
> @@ -111,17 +115,70 @@ void reconfigure_pll(u32 new_cpu_freq)
> mtcpr(CPR0_SPCID, reg);
> reset_needed = 1;
> }
> + }
> + /* Get current value of FWDVA.*/
> + mfcpr(CPR0_PLLD, reg);
> + temp = (reg & PLLD_FWDVA_MASK) >> 16;
I would prefer, if you would insert an empty line before this new statement
complex (after the "}"): Like this:
}
> +
/* Get current value of FWDVA.*/
mfcpr(CPR0_PLLD, reg);
temp = (reg & PLLD_FWDVA_MASK) >> 16;
> + /*
> + * Check to see if FWDVA has been set to value of 1. if it has we must
> + * modify it.
> + */
> + if (temp == 1) {
Again, an empty line makes it easier to read for my taste. Like this:
temp = (reg & PLLD_FWDVA_MASK) >> 16;
> +
/*
* Check to see if FWDVA has been set to value of 1. if it has we must
* modify it.
*/
if (temp == 1) {
> + mfcpr(CPR0_PLLD, reg);
> + /* Get current value of fbdv. */
> + temp = (reg & PLLD_FBDV_MASK) >> 24;
> + fbdv = temp ? temp : 32;
> + /* Get current value of lfbdv. */
> + temp = (reg & PLLD_LFBDV_MASK);
> + lfbdv = temp ? temp : 64;
> + /*
> + * Load register that contains current boot strapping option.
> + */
> + mfcpr(CPR0_ICFG, reg);
> + /* Shift strapping option into low 3 bits.*/
> + reg = (reg >> 28);
> +
> + if (reg == BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_A || reg == BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_B ||
> + reg == BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_D || reg == BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_E) {
I prefer to have parentheses around all the statements:
if ((reg == BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_A) || (reg == BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_B) ||
(reg == BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_D) || (reg == BOOT_STRAP_OPTION_E)) {
> + /*
> + * Get current value of FWDVA. Assign current FWDVA to
> + * new FWDVB.
> + */
> + mfcpr(CPR0_PLLD, reg);
> + target_fwdvb = (reg & PLLD_FWDVA_MASK) >> 16;
> + fwdvb = target_fwdvb ? target_fwdvb : 8;
> + /*
> + * Get current value of FWDVB. Assign current FWDVB to
> + * new FWDVA.
> + */
> + target_fwdva = (reg & PLLD_FWDVB_MASK) >> 8;
> + fwdva = target_fwdva ? target_fwdva : 16;
> + /*
> + * Update CPR0_PLLD with switched FWDVA and FWDVB.
> + */
> + reg &= ~(PLLD_FWDVA_MASK | PLLD_FWDVB_MASK |
> + PLLD_FBDV_MASK | PLLD_LFBDV_MASK);
> + reg |= ((fwdva == 16 ? 0 : fwdva) << 16) |
> + ((fwdvb == 8 ? 0 : fwdvb) << 8) |
> + ((fbdv == 32 ? 0 : fbdv) << 24) |
> + (lfbdv == 64 ? 0 : lfbdv);
Indentation not correct:
reg |= ((fwdva == 16 ? 0 : fwdva) << 16) |
((fwdvb == 8 ? 0 : fwdvb) << 8) |
((fbdv == 32 ? 0 : fbdv) << 24) |
(lfbdv == 64 ? 0 : lfbdv);
Please fix and resubmit. Thanks.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-02 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-25 18:00 [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx fix unstable 440EPx bootstrap options Rupjyoti Sarmah
2010-03-02 13:39 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003021439.53180.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox