From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anatolij Gustschin Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:25:20 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] mpc5121: pdm360ng: add coprocessor POST In-Reply-To: References: <20100321192306.BFE104C022@gemini.denx.de> <1271254909-20398-1-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> <1271254909-20398-2-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> <1271254909-20398-3-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> <1271254909-20398-4-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> <20100414154016.C7A6DE85054@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <20100415112520.3b6c341d@wker> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Detlev, On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:18:13 +0200 Detlev Zundel wrote: ... > >> @@ -286,6 +287,18 @@ struct post_test post_list[] = > >> #if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_BSPEC5 > >> CONFIG_POST_BSPEC5, > >> #endif > >> +#if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_COPROC > >> + { > >> + "Coprocessors communication test", > >> + "coproc_com", > >> + "This test checks communication with coprocessors.", > >> + POST_RAM | POST_ALWAYS | POST_CRITICAL, > >> + &pdm360ng_coprocessor_post_test, > >> + NULL, > >> + NULL, > >> + CONFIG_SYS_POST_COPROC > >> + } > >> +#endif > >> }; > > > > I don't want to see board specific code (pdm360ng_*) in such a global > > file. Please use a more generic approach. > > Do you mean like for example CONFIG_POST_BSPEC1 used for lwmon5? > > Anatolij, this should be straight forward. Similar was in the first patch version. But according to Wolfgang this doesn't belong in the board config file. Anatolij