[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] mpc5121: pdm360ng: add coprocessor POST

[Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>]

Dear Detlev Zundel,

In message <m2bpdlf50q.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> you wrote:
> 
> >> @@ -286,6 +287,18 @@ struct post_test post_list[] =
> >>  #if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_BSPEC5
> >>  	CONFIG_POST_BSPEC5,
> >>  #endif
> >> +#if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_COPROC
> >> +    {
> >> +	"Coprocessors communication test",
> >> +	"coproc_com",
> >> +	"This test checks communication with coprocessors.",
> >> +	POST_RAM | POST_ALWAYS | POST_CRITICAL,
> >> +	&pdm360ng_coprocessor_post_test,
> >> +	NULL,
> >> +	NULL,
> >> +	CONFIG_SYS_POST_COPROC
> >> +    }
> >> +#endif
> >>  };
> >
> > I don't want to see board specific code (pdm360ng_*) in such a global
> > file.  Please use a more generic approach.
> 
> Do you mean like for example CONFIG_POST_BSPEC1 used for lwmon5?

That would be possible, too. But actually the ...POST_COPROC stuff
itself looks OK to me. It's just the "pdm360ng_coprocessor_post_test"
part that needs to be replaced by a more generic name.

I mean, the implementations for lwmon5 and sysmon1 are not exactly
elegant either, but at least they are a bit more generic.

> Anatolij, this should be straight forward.

That's what I thought, too.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Men will always be men -- no matter where they are.
	-- Harry Mudd, "Mudd's Women", stardate 1329.8