From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@gnudd.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Heads-up: Reorganize directory structure
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:31:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100415153127.GA628@morgana.gnudd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100415152247.3891BEEE8D9@gemini.denx.de>
I can see how it'd be
>> nice to split up boards into CPU directories, but we'd have to discuss
>> some of the warts, like where vendor-specific code would be located if
>> we went down that path.
>
> Right. I can see arguments pro and con each of the approaches, and I
> must admit that I have no telling argument for either.
>
> My gut feeling is that I like the existing board/ approach better, but
> I'm open to arguments.
Here a pair of arguments...
Most boards are very similar to the original evaluation kit. For
example, within Nomadik, code for the Calao USB-S8815 is not much
different from code for the NHK8815 evaluation board. But Wolfgang
refused my patch as the files are very similar; I asked how to
proceed, with no reply so far. Note that both board/calao and
board/st exist (board/st only has 1 board, though).
Similarly, I'm working on a dave-tech.eu board series based on
ep9302-ep9315. board/edb93xx exists but "edb" is the evaluation
board; mine should be board/dave/zefeer (board/dave already exists),
though very similar to edb93xx code.
Hope these are arguments WD would consider. Moreover, vendors switch
names often, cpu families do it rarely.
/alessandro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-15 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-13 9:23 [U-Boot] [STATUS] Heads-up: Reorganize directory structure Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-13 16:49 ` Ben Warren
2010-04-13 17:28 ` Stefano Babic
2010-04-13 17:29 ` Ben Warren
2010-04-13 19:24 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-13 20:32 ` Remy Bohmer
2010-04-13 21:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-13 19:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-13 18:55 ` Remy Bohmer
2010-04-13 19:47 ` Jerry Van baren
2010-04-15 7:05 ` Michal Simek
2010-04-15 7:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-15 15:04 ` Peter Tyser
2010-04-15 15:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-15 15:31 ` Alessandro Rubini [this message]
2010-04-15 15:58 ` Peter Tyser
2010-04-15 17:58 ` Alessandro Rubini
2010-04-15 22:44 ` Peter Tyser
2010-04-16 2:42 ` Graeme Russ
2010-04-16 6:58 ` Alessandro Rubini
2010-04-16 7:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-16 7:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-16 11:45 ` Graeme Russ
2010-04-16 13:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-15 23:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-17 8:25 ` Graeme Russ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100415153127.GA628@morgana.gnudd.com \
--to=rubini-list@gnudd.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox