public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] PPC: post_word_{load/store} - eliminate redundant code
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:51:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004211551.00797.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x2h660c0f821004210624y32636405j7746304a059def4a@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Michael,

On Wednesday 21 April 2010 15:24:15 Michael Zaidman wrote:
> >> In order to eliminate redundant code for powerPC architecture when
> >> defining post_word_{load/store} routines I suggest  moving them into
> >> the arch/ppc/lib/commproc.c file rather than adding them to every
> >> arch/ppc/cpu/XXXX.
> > 
> > NAK. The commproc.* files are supposed to contain code dealing with
> > the PowerQUICC Communication Processor Modules. This is in no way the
> > right place for common code.
> 
> Meanwhile the  post_word_{load/store} are located in the commproc.c
> files for the following architectures:
> mpc8260,
> mpc85xx,
> mpc8xx,
> ppc4xx.

I just started looking into this as well.
 
> Looking for the way to add POST functionality for the mpc83xx family I
> realized that the post_word_{load/store} can be generalized for all
> ppc architectures.

Or a weak default version even for all architectures.
 
> Could you point please to the file where such kind of things - common
> for all CPU families of particular architecture should be located?

If done for all architectures, then "post/post.c" (already exists) or 
"lib/post.c" (new file) comes to my mind.

Any comments on this? Other suggestions?

Thanks.

Cheers,
Stefan

--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich,  Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-19 16:44 [U-Boot] [RFC] PPC: post_word_{load/store} - eliminate redundant code Michael Zaidman
2010-04-20 19:55 ` Michael Zaidman
2010-04-20 21:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-21  4:30   ` Stefan Roese
2010-04-21  7:05   ` Michael Zaidman
2010-04-21 13:24   ` Michael Zaidman
2010-04-21 13:51     ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2010-04-21 14:07       ` Michael Zaidman
2010-04-21 13:59     ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-21 14:29       ` Michael Zaidman
2010-04-21 21:40         ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-22  0:16           ` Mike Frysinger
2010-04-22  6:41           ` Michael Zaidman
2010-04-22  9:03             ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-04-22  9:27               ` Michael Zaidman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201004211551.00797.sr@denx.de \
    --to=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox