From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Denk Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 00:07:28 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mtest: Fix end address of increment/decrement test In-Reply-To: <1274392850.18152.253.camel@petert> References: <1274375283-13004-1-git-send-email-ptyser@xes-inc.com> <20100520184330.5EE3CE67644@gemini.denx.de> <1274382441.18152.37.camel@petert> <20100520194443.0203BCCF026@gemini.denx.de> <1274386292.18152.119.camel@petert> <20100520203251.D1BA6CCF026@gemini.denx.de> <1274392850.18152.253.camel@petert> Message-ID: <20100520220728.06A3ACCF026@gemini.denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1274392850.18152.253.camel@petert> you wrote: > > I didn't express it well, but what I was getting at was that the > "Testing X .. Y" would ideally state exactly what is being tested. We have full agreement here. > Unaligned addresses would still be allowed. I think right now the end > address is always automatically aligned to the same alignment as the > start address though, so the current output is very misleading. Agreed, too. > You can see the starting alignment was respected, but the ending > alignment was truncated to be 32-bit aligned to the starting address. > In the above example, I think it would be nice to see "Testing > 00001003 ... 00001ffe". Or some other way such that the user knows that > their input wasn't executed to a T; their end address was truncated. Yep. We are in sync. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de "Who alone has reason to *lie himself out* of actuality? He who *suffers* from it." - Friedrich Nietzsche