From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:57:04 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-pxa next In-Reply-To: <201007142254.55921.marek.vasut@gmail.com> References: <201007060323.45787.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <20100714143151.3cea3468@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> <201007142254.55921.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <201007142257.04285.marek.vasut@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dne St 14. ?ervence 2010 22:54:55 Marek Vasut napsal(a): > Dne St 14. ?ervence 2010 21:31:51 Scott Wood napsal(a): > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:18:48 +0200 > > > > Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > Dear Marek Vasut, > > > > > > In message <201007060323.45787.marek.vasut@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > > Hey, these are some additions and fixes. This is against u-boot.git > > > > master branch. Please pull, thanks. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -- -------- > > > > > > > > The following changes since commit > > 54841ab50c20d6fa6c9cc3eb826989da3a22d934: > > > > Make sure that argv[] argument pointers are not modified. > > > > (2010-07-04 23:55:42 > > > > > > > > +0200) > > > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.denx.de/u-boot-pxa.git next > > > > > > I cannot make head nor tail of the next/next branch references. > > > > > > What am I supposed to do with that? There is no next branch ATM. > > > > > > > Compulab uboot (1): > > > > PXA: PXA3xx NAND Driver > > > > > > This has to go through the NAND custodian. > > > > I've provided comments on this patch. > > > > > > Marek Vasut (4): > > > > Enable PXAFB for PXA27X and PXA3XX > > > > PXA: Add hardware init helper macros > > > > PXA: Add PWM2 and PWM3 regs to pxa-regs.h > > > > PXA: Add OneNAND booting support to start.S > > > > > > Ditto. > > > > This one is just touching ARM init code. It isn't really NAND stuff > > (or OneNAND, for that matter), NAND boot (or other such multistage > > booting) is just the motivation for it. > > Can I get a formal Ack on this then? Thanks please ignore this > > > -Scott