From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:16:13 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] ATMEL Custodians == /dev/null ?? In-Reply-To: <4C5A80E1.9050504@emk-elektronik.de> References: <4C50E124.2000807@emk-elektronik.de> <20100803212858.B8D1C28F@gemini.denx.de> <4C5A80E1.9050504@emk-elektronik.de> Message-ID: <201008051216.14165.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Thursday, August 05, 2010 05:14:09 Reinhard Meyer wrote: > And I am still fighting with GIT in terms of producing Patches and > reworking Patches, if, for example I later find an even "nicer" solution > or continued testing shows up problems. Of course I read the man pages, > read several articles about git, but they usually fail to explain the idea > and inner working of a command. Sometimes commands have (for me) unexpected > effects which are hard to undo. > > As a custodian I sure would need more help and advice on how to handle > certain situations. I would (for start) have to rely on advice from > Wolfgang or someone else. rebasing in my own branch tends to be how i manage my own changes. this allows you to merge commits into one, change the order of things, edit changes in he middle of a tree, or drop commits. but this is obviously for your own branches only and not for public branches other people are working off of. i can probably answer most of your git related questions ... not sure if Wolfgang prefers them to be answered off list ... > If, after considering my comments above, you still think you really need a > custodian for AT91, I am game for it. go for it -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20100805/90ff1f99/attachment.pgp