From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] ATMEL Custodians == /dev/null ??
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:20:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008062020.29921.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C5CA269.8010401@emk-elektronik.de>
On Friday, August 06, 2010 20:01:45 Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> If, after considering my comments above, you still think you really need
> >> a custodian for AT91, I am game for it.
> >
> > go for it
>
> considering that both AVR32 and AT91 share most of the peripheral hardware
> building blocks, and therefore share the drivers, it seems to make sense to
> have an atmel custodian tree instead of avr32 and at91. Each change to a
> shared
> driver must (at least with MAKEALL) be checked for both architectures and
> adding it to both trees would make life unnecessary complicated...
yes, but the cores are going to be radically different. so i imagine you'd be
fine with the peripheral drivers, but not the avr32 core. it's your time
though of course.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20100806/1cb5b623/attachment.pgp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-07 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-29 2:02 [U-Boot] ATMEL Custodians == /dev/null ?? Reinhard Meyer
2010-07-29 4:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-03 21:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-05 9:14 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-05 10:13 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-08-05 10:44 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-05 12:03 ` Eric Bénard
2010-08-05 16:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-05 18:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-07 0:01 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-07 0:20 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2010-08-07 0:58 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-07 3:39 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-07 21:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-07 21:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-07 21:24 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-07 23:19 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-07 23:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-08 0:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-05 13:21 ` Bas Mevissen
2010-08-07 22:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-09 1:27 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-08-09 5:59 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-09 6:29 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-08-09 6:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-09 8:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-09 11:13 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-08-09 11:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-09 15:48 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201008062020.29921.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox