[U-Boot] ATMEL Custodians == /dev/null ??

[Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>]

Dear Reinhard Meyer,

In message <4C5CA269.8010401@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>
> considering that both AVR32 and AT91 share most of the peripheral hardware
> building blocks, and therefore share the drivers, it seems to make sense to
> have an atmel custodian tree instead of avr32 and at91. Each change to a 
> shared
> driver must (at least with MAKEALL) be checked for both architectures and
> adding it to both trees would make life unnecessary complicated...

I'm fine with that.

You take this, then? :-)

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"...one of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was  that,
lacking  zero,  they had no way to indicate successful termination of
their C programs."                                     - Robert Firth