From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] APM82xxx: Add CPU and other peripheral support
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:46:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009030946.22440.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100902190137.5AEB9153781@gemini.denx.de>
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thursday 02 September 2010 21:01:37 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hm.., the whole CPU ID code in "arch/powerpc/cpu/ppc4xx/cpu.c" has
> become a mess.
>
> Stefan:
>
> is there any deeper logic for the repeated #ifdef's there, when we
> finally do a switch on the PVR anyway?
>
> Instead of painstakingly concatenating "AMCC PowerPC 4" with "05"
> and later "GP Rev. B" we could shrink this into a plain
>
> case PVR_405GP_RB:
> puts("AMCC PowerPC 405GP Rev. B");
> break;
>
> Or am I missing something?
IIRC, then the main reason for this is the code size reduction. Using your
version would increase the code size quite a bit. But I concur, it would be
much better readable. So just let me know, and I'll try to come up with a
patch cleaning this up a bit.
> Let's get rid of all these nested #ifdef's...
As described in some comments, the problem is that some SoC's have the same
PVR (for example 440EP rev C and 440GR rev B have same PVR). I have no idea
how this identification could be solved without such ifdef's.
But you are right. Some of the ifdef's can be removed. Again, this would also
result in a bigger image size though.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-03 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-02 1:16 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] APM82xxx: Add CPU and other peripheral support tmarri at apm.com
2010-09-02 11:55 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-02 18:01 ` Tirumala Marri
2010-09-02 19:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-03 7:46 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2010-09-03 8:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-03 11:26 ` Stefan Roese
2010-09-03 1:48 ` Tirumala Marri
2010-09-03 7:18 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009030946.22440.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox