From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:37:12 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4 v2] cfi_flash: Add weak default for
	cfi_flash_bank_addr()
In-Reply-To: <20100909115745.7D8151506AA@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1284026772-16694-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de>
	<201009091253.50411.sr@denx.de>
	<20100909115745.7D8151506AA@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <201009091437.12285.sr@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Thursday 09 September 2010 13:57:45 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > Was the change from "[CFI_MAX_FLASH_BANKS]" to "[]" intentional?
> > 
> > Yes. Do you see a problem with this change?
> 
> Yes - why?
> 
> No, I don't see any immediate problems. Just wanted to be sure it was
> intentional and has been tested in a number of different
> configurations.

Yes, I've successfully tested with some different flash configurations:

- sequoia with 1 NOR flash bank
- lwmon5 with 1 NOR flash bank
- lwmon5 with 2 NOR flash bank

Cheers,
Stefan

--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich,  Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de