[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] OneNAND: Move largepage_memorybased

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>]

Dne Po 4. ??jna 2010 19:59:14 Scott Wood napsal(a):
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:33:56 +0200
> 
> Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This moves "struct nand_bbt_descr largepage_memorybased" into
> > "onenand_default_bbt" as that's the only place where this is used.
> > 
> > This also removes an entry from .data section. (For me, this section
> > disappears after relocation).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_bbt.c |   25 ++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_bbt.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_bbt.c index 1354877..c5d3905 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_bbt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_bbt.c
> > @@ -227,19 +227,6 @@ int onenand_scan_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct
> > nand_bbt_descr *bd)
> > 
> >  	return ret;
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > -/*
> > - * Define some generic bad / good block scan pattern which are used
> > - * while scanning a device for factory marked good / bad blocks.
> > - */
> > -static uint8_t scan_ff_pattern[] = { 0xff, 0xff };
> > -
> > -static struct nand_bbt_descr largepage_memorybased = {
> > -	.options = 0,
> > -	.offs = 0,
> > -	.len = 2,
> > -	.pattern = scan_ff_pattern,
> > -};
> > -
> > 
> >  /**
> >  
> >   * onenand_default_bbt - [OneNAND Interface] Select a default bad block
> >   table for the device * @param mtd		MTD device structure
> > 
> > @@ -252,6 +239,18 @@ int onenand_default_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> > 
> >  	struct onenand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
> >  	struct bbm_info *bbm;
> > 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Define some generic bad / good block scan pattern which are used
> > +	 * while scanning a device for factory marked good / bad blocks.
> > +	 */
> > +	uint8_t scan_ff_pattern[] = { 0xff, 0xff };
> > +	struct nand_bbt_descr largepage_memorybased = {
> > +		.options = 0,
> > +		.offs = 0,
> > +		.len = 2,
> > +		.pattern = scan_ff_pattern,
> > +	};
> > +
> > 
> >  	this->bbm = malloc(sizeof(struct bbm_info));
> >  	if (!this->bbm)
> >  	
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> NACK, you're taking the address of stack data and using it after the
> stack frame goes away.
> 
The .data section doesn't exist at 0x0 (where the stuff is linked) when this code 
is executed in my case.

> What problem are you trying to solve?
> 
> -Scott