* [U-Boot] Observation: rebasing against current master increases code size by 1.8k
@ 2010-10-20 7:30 Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-20 7:42 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Reinhard Meyer @ 2010-10-20 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Just an observation on my AT91SAM9XE based board:
based on yesterday's master + arm elf relocations +
my (then not mainstreamed) patches: 256288 bytes
based on current master: 258020 bytes
Otherwise it compiles without warnings and runs fine.
Just some non-reloc-related patches have increased
code size by that amount - finding out which are to
"blame" is probably not worth the effort.
Best Regards,
Reinhard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Observation: rebasing against current master increases code size by 1.8k
2010-10-20 7:30 [U-Boot] Observation: rebasing against current master increases code size by 1.8k Reinhard Meyer
@ 2010-10-20 7:42 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-20 8:02 ` Reinhard Meyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2010-10-20 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Wednesday, October 20, 2010 03:30:33 Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> Just an observation on my AT91SAM9XE based board:
>
> based on yesterday's master + arm elf relocations +
> my (then not mainstreamed) patches: 256288 bytes
>
> based on current master: 258020 bytes
>
> Otherwise it compiles without warnings and runs fine.
> Just some non-reloc-related patches have increased
> code size by that amount - finding out which are to
> "blame" is probably not worth the effort.
look at the env change ?
ea882baf9c17cd142c99e3ff640d3ab01daa5cec
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20101020/a815d9c7/attachment.pgp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Observation: rebasing against current master increases code size by 1.8k
2010-10-20 7:42 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2010-10-20 8:02 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-20 8:11 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Reinhard Meyer @ 2010-10-20 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Mike Frysinger,
> On Wednesday, October 20, 2010 03:30:33 Reinhard Meyer wrote:
>> Just an observation on my AT91SAM9XE based board:
>>
>> based on yesterday's master + arm elf relocations +
>> my (then not mainstreamed) patches: 256288 bytes
>>
>> based on current master: 258020 bytes
>>
>> Otherwise it compiles without warnings and runs fine.
>> Just some non-reloc-related patches have increased
>> code size by that amount - finding out which are to
>> "blame" is probably not worth the effort.
>
> look at the env change ?
> ea882baf9c17cd142c99e3ff640d3ab01daa5cec
That (old) commit was in mainstream already. Related fixups
do not matter for my board since env_mmc ist not included
and ARM_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS is set.
Reinhard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] Observation: rebasing against current master increases code size by 1.8k
2010-10-20 8:02 ` Reinhard Meyer
@ 2010-10-20 8:11 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2010-10-20 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Wednesday, October 20, 2010 04:02:26 Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 20, 2010 03:30:33 Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> >> Just an observation on my AT91SAM9XE based board:
> >>
> >> based on yesterday's master + arm elf relocations +
> >> my (then not mainstreamed) patches: 256288 bytes
> >>
> >> based on current master: 258020 bytes
> >>
> >> Otherwise it compiles without warnings and runs fine.
> >> Just some non-reloc-related patches have increased
> >> code size by that amount - finding out which are to
> >> "blame" is probably not worth the effort.
> >
> > look at the env change ?
> >
> > ea882baf9c17cd142c99e3ff640d3ab01daa5cec
>
> That (old) commit was in mainstream already. Related fixups
> do not matter for my board since env_mmc ist not included
> and ARM_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS is set.
it isnt old. it was *committed* a while ago, but wasnt *merged* into mainline
until after the latest release (v2010.09). so it's new to the master branch.
that's the only common code change that pops into my mind after the v2010.09
release was made.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20101020/64149e48/attachment.pgp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-20 8:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-20 7:30 [U-Boot] Observation: rebasing against current master increases code size by 1.8k Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-20 7:42 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-20 8:02 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-20 8:11 ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox