From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Prevent malloc with size 0
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:20:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010220320.23691.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFFEF252D4.0F48F752-ONC12577C4.001FD864-C12577C4.0021E5D5@transmode.se>
On Friday, October 22, 2010 02:10:16 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote on 2010/10/21 21:51:53:
> > it is useful for malloc(0) == NULL. the glibc behavior is downright
> > obnoxious. we disable this for uClibc and dont see problems. if
> > anything, we catch accidental programming mistakes which then get fixed.
>
> There is a value in having the possibility to express a
> 0 bytes data set. Consider this simple example:
> An app read lines from a file and mallocs each line read and builds an
> array with malloced pointers. The last entry is a NULL ptr to
> signal EOF. This breaks down for empty lines if malloc(0)
> returns NULL.
i dont think so ... C strings are always at least one byte, so an empty line
would be malloc(1)
> Not to mention error handling, as I recall, a malloc(0) that returns NULL
> does not set errno which screws error handling. One have to bend over
> just to cope with this.
that depends on your implementation. in u-boot, there really is no "errno"
concept. but i dont see how this matters as i dont see any example in u-boot
context where malloc(0) is a problem.
> > why exactly do you want malloc(0) to return valid memory ? i would
> > rather have u-boot return an error.
>
> Ideally it should return a ptr to invalid memory so you get a SEGV if you
> try to defer the ptr but I take anything over a NULL ptr.
the concept of an invalid pointer is pretty arch-specific. and it changes the
semantics of what the vast majority of coders (and their code) out there
expect -- NULL means error while non-NULL means success.
a better question might be "why isnt a NULL pointer on your platform an
invalid pointer" ? ive added a simple CONFIG define for Blackfin users to do
just that -- make access to the low 1KiB of memory generate an exception. it
does so with pretty much 0 runtime overhead.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20101022/ef1945ae/attachment.pgp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-22 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-21 9:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH] Prevent malloc with size 0 Kostaras Nikolaos
2010-10-21 11:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-21 11:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-21 11:45 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-21 11:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-21 11:56 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-21 12:02 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-21 12:54 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-21 19:51 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-21 21:10 ` Graeme Russ
2010-10-21 21:27 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-03-31 19:59 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-01 12:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-01 14:01 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-01 14:15 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-01 14:21 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-01 22:40 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-01 23:45 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-01 23:52 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 0:13 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 0:25 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 1:04 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 1:40 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 2:51 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 3:05 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 6:39 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 3:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-02 3:16 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 3:36 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 3:43 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 4:23 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 4:27 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 6:55 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 7:17 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 7:40 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 14:05 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 14:26 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 14:42 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 15:08 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 15:23 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 16:00 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 16:39 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 17:22 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 18:00 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 18:40 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 19:14 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-02 21:02 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 19:23 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 20:28 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 20:56 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 20:59 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 21:14 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-04-02 23:35 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-03 10:35 ` Graeme Russ
2012-10-16 6:31 ` Marek Vasut
2012-10-16 9:22 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-10-16 10:43 ` Marek Vasut
2012-10-16 11:46 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2012-10-16 10:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-10-16 22:41 ` Graeme Russ
2012-04-02 3:10 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-02 3:36 ` Marek Vasut
2010-10-22 6:10 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-22 7:18 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-22 7:47 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-22 7:20 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2010-10-22 7:37 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-22 7:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-22 8:34 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-22 15:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-22 16:40 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-22 17:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-23 9:14 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-10-22 17:36 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-23 9:23 ` Joakim Tjernlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010220320.23691.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox