From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sughosh Ganu <sughoshg@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:39:55 +0530
Subject: [U-Boot] Most ARM CPU's have buggy clear_bss?
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=7AAP7P20Gp6eVziwQ7L_okE5tOSX+XY1zyGaL@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimP9_Am6PKt8YchW8Mrj8LWujorXs=f+RtfREJ4@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101027080111.GA26224@Hardy>
	<AANLkTin6RoOX+1PDJLQOv+55-hDcgnZtU4SNLw6Mn6_W@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101027085426.GA1362@Hardy>
	<AANLkTi=7AAP7P20Gp6eVziwQ7L_okE5tOSX+XY1zyGaL@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20101027090955.GB1362@Hardy>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Wed Oct 27, 2010 at 11:58:30AM +0300, Darius Augulis wrote:

> No, there could be several different relocation methods - with and
> without preloader etc.
> There is another definition CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT which changes
> boot sequence dramatically.
> And it isn't CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC dependent.

  I don't think we can define CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT with
  relocation enabled unless we ensure that the TEXT_BASE would be same
  as the relocation address.

-sughosh