From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V7] POST cleanup.
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 23:55:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101113225511.92BACCEA55B@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101026210959.518031365D8@gemini.denx.de>
Dear Michael,
Ping!
In message <20101026210959.518031365D8@gemini.denx.de> I wrote:
> Dear Michael Zaidman,
>
> In message <d520c6ef298416a03789ebfa4e05e257b5331693.1284965175.git.michael.zaidman@gmail.com> you wrote:
> > - Revives POST for blackfin arch;
> > - Removes redundant code:
> > arch/blackfin/lib/post.c
> > arch/powerpc/cpu/ppc4xx/commproc.c
> > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc512x/common.c
> > - fixes up the post_word_{load|store} usage.
>
> Unfortunately it turns out that the code now contains a few nasty
> bugs...
>
> ...
> > #define CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_OFFSET (CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_END - CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE)
> > -#define CONFIG_SYS_POST_WORD_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_OFFSET - 0x4)
> > -#define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_OFFSET CONFIG_SYS_POST_WORD_ADDR
> > +#define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_OFFSET (CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_OFFSET - 0x4)
>
> This is a seriously broken design, as it sneaks in storage for a
> variable in a storage location where it is not expected.
>
> The "official" layout is that we have CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_BYTES
> available; the top CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE bytes (now
> GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE) are used for global data, and the part below
> is used for the stack. No other room is reserved there.
>
> Shifting down the stack by 4 bytes as it's done here causes that the
> stack is not correctly aligned any more, which may cause really nasty
> subsequent errors.
>
> But it's even worse.
>
> > diff --git a/include/configs/mpc5121-common.h b/include/configs/mpc5121-common.h
> > index 96fab20..afae1ab 100644
> > --- a/include/configs/mpc5121-common.h
> > +++ b/include/configs/mpc5121-common.h
> ...
> > -#define CONFIG_SYS_POST_WORD_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_OFFSET - 0x4)
> > -#define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_OFFSET CONFIG_SYS_POST_WORD_ADDR
> > +#define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_OFFSET (CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_OFFSET - 0x4)
>
> There the same is done, but what happens actually?
>
> Have a look how the stack setup gets implemented in
> "arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc512x/start.S":
>
> ...
> 244 in_flash:
> 245 lis r1, (CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_OFFSET)@h
> 246 ori r1, r1, (CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR + CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_OFFSET)@l
> 247
> 248 li r0, 0 /* Make room for stack frame header and */
> 249 stwu r0, -4(r1) /* clear final stack frame so that */
> 250 stwu r0, -4(r1) /* stack backtraces terminate cleanly */
> ...
>
> As you can see, the code does not use CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_OFFSET at
> all; instead it performs a calculation which should be redundant, but
> in the current code it means that the location of the POST_WORD is
> right in the initial stack.
>
> I did not check if the code for other processors has similar issues.
>
>
> "Reserving" private storage like that is bad, as other involved
> parties probably have no knowledge of such a private reservation.
>
>
> Why do we not simply reserve a word in the global data structure instead?
>
>
> This bug needs pretty urgent fixing.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
Viele Gr??e,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
If a train station is a place where a train stops,
then what's a workstation?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-13 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-02 10:38 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] POST cleanup v3 (incremental) Michael Zaidman
2010-05-06 21:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-05-09 15:27 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] POST cleanup Michael Zaidman
2010-05-10 11:17 ` Detlev Zundel
2010-05-10 11:39 ` Michael Zaidman
2010-05-12 12:02 ` Detlev Zundel
2010-05-12 12:49 ` Michael Zaidman
2010-06-27 14:00 ` Michael Zaidman
2010-05-10 12:12 ` Michael Zaidman
2010-05-10 13:33 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] " Michael Zaidman
2010-06-29 19:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-06-30 16:16 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] " Michael Zaidman
2010-08-08 6:53 ` Michael Zaidman
2010-08-08 20:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-10 13:37 ` Michael Zaidman
2010-09-20 6:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V7] " Michael Zaidman
2010-09-21 19:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-26 21:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-11-13 22:55 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2010-11-21 12:34 ` Michael Zaidman
2010-12-06 8:00 ` Michael Zaidman
2010-05-10 11:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] " Anatolij Gustschin
2010-05-10 11:55 ` Michael Zaidman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101113225511.92BACCEA55B@gemini.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox