From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:19:20 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BRFC_PATCH_1/2=5D_hashtable=3A_drop_all?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_non-reentrant=09versions?= In-Reply-To: References: <1291807565-4831-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <201012080627.45357.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <201012082019.21687.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 07:31:54 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 06:26:04 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > The non-reentrant versions of the hashtable functions operate on a > > > single shared hashtable. So if two different people try using these > > > funcs for two different purposes, they'll cause problems for the > > > other. > > > > > > Avoid this by converting all existing hashtable consumers over to the > > > reentrant versions and then punting the non-reentrant ones. > > > > oh, and this does shrink the final u-boot a little, so that's good > > Nice, over the last years I have noticed that u-boot has grown a lot. > I had to disable a few non essential commands to make it it fit. > > Does anyone else share my concern about the rapid growth of u-boot? i try to go through things about once a release to see about culling crap, but i focus on things that affect Blackfin, so relocation isnt one -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20101208/bee186b7/attachment.pgp