From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Denk Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:20:50 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL In-Reply-To: <20110201135136.0817fe5a@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> References: <1296498767-26408-1-git-send-email-Haiying.Wang@freescale.com> <20110131193309.745E7D4D67C@gemini.denx.de> <20110131135548.50d65759@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> <20110201073401.1B343B187@gemini.denx.de> <20110201102446.23b4a2e9@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> <20110201193229.7C545B187@gemini.denx.de> <20110201135136.0817fe5a@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20110201202050.CA1CFB187@gemini.denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Scott Wood, In message <20110201135136.0817fe5a@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > > > Prior to the introduction of LDFLAGS_u-boot, was LDFLAGS not what was > > > used? So before, anything that board/cpu code adds directly to LDFLAGS > > > (maybe they're supposed to use PLATFORM_LDFLAGS, but not all do) was > > > used in the final link. After 8aba9dc, only things in > > > PLATFORM_LDFLAGS plus -Bstatic and -T are used in the final link. > > > > And this is correct for all boards? > > By "this" do you mean the switch to PLATFORM_LDFLAGS in 8aba9dc, or the > switch back to LDFLAGS? It's not obvious to me that the dropping of I don;t understand why you contine to talk about "switch to PLATFORM_LDFLAGS in 8aba9dc". There was no such switch - at least I cannot see it. I see only a switch in your patch. This is why I'm asking. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de HANDLE WITH EXTREME CARE: This Product Contains Minute Electrically Charged Particles Moving at Velocities in Excess of Five Hundred Million Miles Per Hour.