From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:57:41 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] at91sam9263_nandflash build issues
In-Reply-To: <20110202134300.515c3270@udp111988uds>
References: <201102020849.36451.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<20110202134300.515c3270@udp111988uds>
Message-ID: <201102030057.42024.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Wednesday 02 February 2011 20:43:00 Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:49:36 +0100
> 
> Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/config.mk b/config.mk
> > index 5147c35..fe1d40c 100644
> > --- a/config.mk
> > +++ b/config.mk
> > @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ $(obj)%.s:  %.c
> > 
> >  # If the list of objects to link is empty, just create an empty
> >  built-in.o cmd_link_o_target = $(if $(strip $1),\
> > 
> > -                     $(LD) $(LDFLAGS) -r -o $@ $1,\
> > +                     $(LD) -r -o $@ $1,\
> > 
> >                       rm -f $@; $(AR) rcs $@ )
> 
> LDFLAGS was used here deliberately by commit:
> 8aba9dceebb14144e07d19593111ee3a999c37fc

Oh my, it's not my platform. Also, you missed the comment where I said the patch 
is a mess, not a patch to be merged :) This time I really only forwarded a 
bugreport from irc channel with a bad sketch of a patch.
> 
> I suspect your problem is because you have --gc-sections in
> PLATFORM_LDFLAGS.  The above commit changed architectures that set
> --gc-sections to use LDFLAGS_u-boot instead, but it missed boards that
> set it.
> 
> Also note this patch, which if applied would mean that you'd need to
> put --gc-sections in LDFLAGS_FINAL instead of LDFLAGS_u-boot:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/81206/
> 
> -Scott