From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 03:44:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102150344.32741.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D4798E2.3050500@ti.com>
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 00:23:46 Aneesh V wrote:
> BSS footprint of fat.c is very high. It has three buffers each of size
> 64KB. To workaround this problem I have done something like below(The
> way x-loader works around this problem today).
> CONFIG_SYS_SPL_FAT_BUFFER_BASE is in SDRAM.Is this ok?
>
> Also, I was wondering why we need 3 such scratch buffers in this
> implementation. I do not understand this code. But I was wondering if we
> could work with just one 64K buffer?
i'd be pretty surprised if these couldnt be cleaned up in some way. sucking
up 64KiB * 3 just for vfat is pretty f-in crazy. no other FS code needs this.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110215/47b48daf/attachment.pgp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-15 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-01 5:23 [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues Aneesh V
2011-02-01 6:52 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-02-01 7:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-01 8:26 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-01 8:35 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-02-01 10:05 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-01 10:18 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-02-01 10:48 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-01 12:43 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-02-01 13:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-01 10:53 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-11 21:16 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-02-11 22:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-13 21:40 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-09-28 20:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-12 6:13 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-01 7:04 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-01 7:11 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-01 8:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-01 8:27 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-01 7:55 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-01 8:18 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-01 8:48 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2011-02-01 10:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-02-02 13:17 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-02 13:37 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-02 14:01 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-02 15:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-03 10:38 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-05 6:58 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-11 6:28 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-11 6:39 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-11 6:57 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-11 8:15 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-02-11 8:27 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-02 21:01 ` Graeme Russ
2011-02-03 7:01 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-03 10:05 ` Graeme Russ
2011-02-03 6:49 ` sughosh ganu
2011-02-03 7:22 ` Aneesh V
2011-02-15 8:44 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201102150344.32741.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox