From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Denk Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:17:48 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] ARM: Incorrect ROM protection range? In-Reply-To: <4D66A7CD.9020309@free.fr> References: <4D660030.409@free.fr> <4D6609C5.3040203@denx.de> <4D6611A7.5050802@free.fr> <20110224093925.90139146940@gemini.denx.de> <4D664801.2000001@free.fr> <4D665969.1@free.fr> <20110224134139.92BD0D5AF8C@gemini.denx.de> <4D6680E4.1070405@free.fr> <20110224183805.C3CB0D708E3@gemini.denx.de> <4D66A7CD.9020309@free.fr> Message-ID: <20110224201748.7225613676F@gemini.denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4D66A7CD.9020309@free.fr> you wrote: > > > As far as I can tell, arch/powerpc/lib/board.c , > > arch/avr32/lib/board.c and examples/standalone/stubs.c actually all > > mean __bss_end, as well as all the start.S files, so this seems to be > > consistently used at least. > > I'd come to the same conclusion on my side. However you don't say how > you would like the change to be done. Would a single commit for renaming > _end into _bss_end and then creating _end after .dynsym be ok for you? Ah, sorry. Well, these are two logically separate things: the first is just a renamer that should basicly result in the very same images built on all systems (which can easily be verified semi-automatically). The second step would be adding _end at the end of the used data area (end of .dynsym) on ARM only. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de G's Third Law: In spite of all evidence to the contra- ry, the entire universe is composed of only two basic substances: magic and bullshit. H's Dictum: There is no magic ...