From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] RFC: porting u-boot to sequoia based nand booting board
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 15:41:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105171541.01662.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD2717D.800@dawning.com>
Hi Alex,
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 15:00:45 Alex Waterman wrote:
> I am working on porting U-Boot to a sequoia based PPC440 board. It boots
> off NAND flash via the NDFC on the PPC440. Our NAND chip has a 16 bit bus
> which has presented some minor problems.
Yes, until now, all 4xx boards use 8bit NAND chips.
> The NDFC code is pretty much what we need except for a few functions that I
> made some changes to. In particular the two functions that I changed are
> board_nand_init() and board_nand_select_device().
What changes did you have to make? Some 8/16 bit related changes? Or something
else?
> However, I would like to
> use the rest of the NDFC code.
It should be the goal, to use *only* the common NDFC code. If you have found
some bugs, or you need some changes for 16bit devices, we should try to
integrate them into the common code.
> All of the functions in the NDFC code are
> declared static so I can't access them outside of ndfc.c; is there a
> reason for that? Does it save code space?
One idea behind the static declarations is to not pollute the namespace.
> At the moment, in the source tree I have, I just copied ndfc.c to a
> different source file, made the changes I needed, and compiled that.
Ughhh!
> But I
> don't like the idea of duplicating a significant amount of code. Any
> suggestions on how I should proceed with this?
Yes, please see above. Please explain what changes you need exactly and we
will see, if we can integrate them into the common driver.
> Likewise much of our board specific support files are copies from the
> sequoia code. Would it be better to symlink to the ones that are not
> modified? Or is it OK to just copy the relevant source files into our own
> board directory and make minor adjustments as needed?
Usually we copy those files into a new board directly. When the similarities
are too big, then we should probably think about splitting to common parts
into some other directory (arch/powerpc/cpu/ppc4xx/ppc440epx.c ???).
Best regards,
Stefan
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-17 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-17 13:00 [U-Boot] RFC: porting u-boot to sequoia based nand booting board Alex Waterman
2011-05-17 13:41 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2011-05-17 14:11 ` Alex Waterman
2011-05-17 15:37 ` Stefan Roese
2011-05-17 17:05 ` Scott Wood
2011-05-17 17:49 ` Alex Waterman
2011-05-17 19:20 ` Scott Wood
2011-05-17 21:15 ` Alex Waterman
2011-05-17 21:32 ` Scott Wood
2011-05-18 12:49 ` Alex Waterman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201105171541.01662.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox