[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: MX5: Remove broken leftover TO-2 errata workaround

[David Jander <david.jander@protonic.nl>]

On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:49:15 +0200
Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:

> On 07/14/2011 12:20 PM, David Jander wrote:
> 
> >> However, you also remove the setup for TO2. To fix the TO2 issue, we
> >> should read correctly the revision number (from IIM or from a fixed
> >> address, I do not remember now), and then apply the compare to the read
> >> value.
> > 
> > Yes, you are right.
> > But I don't know how to do it correctly.
> 
> There is a similar code always in lowlevel_init.S
> 
> 189         ldr r1, =0x0
> 190         ldr r3, [r1, #ROM_SI_REV]
> 191         cmp r3, #0x10
> 
> As we can suppose this is correct, the same code can be used in the macro.

Hmmm. Hadn't seen that part. Can we trust this?... because I have no means of
testing for the TO2 case.

> > OTOH, it is broken now for all platforms.
> 
> Agree we have to fix it. I only dislike to break some boards. As far as
> I know, there is many mx51evk boards sold by Freescale with the TO2 chip.

Ah, ok. AFAICR, our EVK has a TO3, but I agree there might be low quantities
of EVKs with TO2 still in use somewhere.

> > My patch fixes it for TO3 and
> > newer. L2 write-combine has a significant performance impact, and I wonder
> > how many boards there are still that use such an old (prototype silicon)
> > processor.
> 
> I think only on the evaluation boards, but they were sold and delivered.

Ok.

> > IMHO, the vast majority of MX51 users will benefit from this patch, and the
> > rest shouldn't have any more problems than they have already, so can we
> > just apply this, please?
> 
> Not as it is  - I prefer we fix the test. Can you resubmit with the
> proposed changes ?

Ok, thanks for pointing out the missing code. I will fix and re-submit.

Best regards,

-- 
David Jander
Protonic Holland.