public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] cmd_sf: add "update" subcommand to do smart SPI flash update
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 01:04:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108210104.11721.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313879751-1093-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>

On Sunday, August 21, 2011 12:35:51 AM Mike Frysinger wrote:
> From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> 
> This adds a new SPI flash command which only rewrites blocks if the
> contents need to change. This can speed up SPI flash programming when much
> of the data is unchanged from what is already there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> ---
> v4
> 	- tweak summary
> 	- fix printf warnings with %d vs %zu
> 	- fix help string and missing/extra newlines
> 
> TODO: it'd be nice if we supported +len like we do with erase ...
> 
>  common/cmd_sf.c |   84
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed,
> 81 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/cmd_sf.c b/common/cmd_sf.c
> index 11a491d..9b7d61b 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_sf.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_sf.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>   */
> 
>  #include <common.h>
> +#include <malloc.h>
>  #include <spi_flash.h>
> 
>  #include <asm/io.h>
> @@ -109,6 +110,78 @@ static int do_spi_flash_probe(int argc, char * const
> argv[]) return 0;
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * Write a block of data to SPI flash, first checking if it is different
> from + * what is already there.
> + *
> + * If the data being written is the same, then *skipped is incremented by
> len. + *
> + * @param flash		flash context pointer
> + * @param offset	flash offset to write
> + * @param len		number of bytes to write
> + * @param buf		buffer to write from
> + * @param cmp_buf	read buffer to use to compare data
> + * @param skipped	Count of skipped data (incremented by this function)
> + * @return NULL if OK, else a string containing the stage which failed
> + */
> +static const char *spi_flash_update_block(struct spi_flash *flash, u32
> offset, +		size_t len, const char *buf, char *cmp_buf, size_t *skipped)

Can't you just pass here a structure instead of this wicked pointer alchemy ?

> +{
> +	debug("offset=%#x, sector_size=%#x, len=%#x\n",
> +		offset, flash->sector_size, len);
> +	if (spi_flash_read(flash, offset, len, cmp_buf))
> +		return "read";
> +	if (memcmp(cmp_buf, buf, len) == 0) {
> +		debug("Skip region %x size %x: no change\n",
> +			offset, len);
> +		*skipped += len;
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +	if (spi_flash_erase(flash, offset, len))
> +		return "erase";
> +	if (spi_flash_write(flash, offset, len, buf))
> +		return "write";

Numeric value won't be ok ? You can have these in the calling function instead 
of returning a char *.

> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Update an area of SPI flash by erasing and writing any blocks which
> need + * to change. Existing blocks with the correct data are left
> unchanged. + *
> + * @param flash		flash context pointer
> + * @param offset	flash offset to write
> + * @param len		number of bytes to write
> + * @param buf		buffer to write from
> + * @return 0 if ok, 1 on error
> + */
> +static int spi_flash_update(struct spi_flash *flash, u32 offset,
> +		size_t len, const char *buf)
> +{
> +	const char *err_oper = NULL;
> +	char *cmp_buf;
> +	const char *end = buf + len;
> +	size_t todo;		/* number of bytes to do in this pass */
> +	size_t skipped;		/* statistics */

You can allocate a structure holding the internal state of the "update" command, 
which I mentioned above, here, on stack.

> +
> +	cmp_buf = malloc(flash->sector_size);
> +	if (cmp_buf) {

if (!cmp_buf)
	goto err;

... rest of code ...

Don't be afraid of goto and failpaths.

> +		for (skipped = 0; buf < end; buf += todo, offset += todo) {
> +			todo = min(end - buf, flash->sector_size);
> +			err_oper = spi_flash_update_block(flash, offset, todo,
> +					buf, cmp_buf, &skipped);
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		err_oper = "malloc";
> +	}
> +	free(cmp_buf);
> +	if (err_oper) {
> +		printf("SPI flash failed in %s step\n", err_oper);
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +	printf("%zu bytes written, %zu bytes skipped\n", len - skipped, skipped);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int do_spi_flash_read_write(int argc, char * const argv[])
>  {
>  	unsigned long addr;
> @@ -137,7 +210,9 @@ static int do_spi_flash_read_write(int argc, char *
> const argv[]) return 1;
>  	}
> 
> -	if (strcmp(argv[0], "read") == 0)
> +	if (strcmp(argv[0], "update") == 0)
> +		ret = spi_flash_update(flash, offset, len, buf);
> +	else if (strcmp(argv[0], "read") == 0)
>  		ret = spi_flash_read(flash, offset, len, buf);
>  	else
>  		ret = spi_flash_write(flash, offset, len, buf);
> @@ -203,7 +278,8 @@ static int do_spi_flash(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int
> argc, char * const argv[ return 1;
>  	}
> 
> -	if (strcmp(cmd, "read") == 0 || strcmp(cmd, "write") == 0)
> +	if (strcmp(cmd, "read") == 0 || strcmp(cmd, "write") == 0 ||
> +	    strcmp(cmd, "update") == 0)
>  		ret = do_spi_flash_read_write(argc, argv);
>  	else if (strcmp(cmd, "erase") == 0)
>  		ret = do_spi_flash_erase(argc, argv);
> @@ -228,5 +304,7 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
>  	"sf write addr offset len	- write `len' bytes from memory\n"
>  	"				  at `addr' to flash at `offset'\n"
>  	"sf erase offset [+]len		- erase `len' bytes from `offset'\n"
> -	"				  `+len' round up `len' to block size"
> +	"				  `+len' round up `len' to block size\n"
> +	"sf update addr offset len	- erase and write `len' bytes from memory\n"
> +	"				  at `addr' to flash at `offset'"
>  );

I like this patch!

Cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-20 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-19 19:28 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Add 'sf update' command to do smart SPI flash update Simon Glass
2011-08-19 21:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-19 21:25   ` Simon Glass
2011-08-19 22:28     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-23 22:01       ` Simon Glass
2011-08-23 22:16         ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-24  3:41           ` Che-liang Chiou
2011-08-24  4:11             ` Simon Glass
2011-08-20 22:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] cmd_sf: add "update" subcommand " Mike Frysinger
2011-08-20 23:04   ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2011-08-21 10:37     ` Simon Glass
2011-08-21 16:35       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-22 22:53         ` Simon Glass
2011-08-21 10:27   ` Simon Glass
2011-08-21 16:34     ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201108210104.11721.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox