From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ext2: Cache line aligned partial sector bounce buffer
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:23:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108231323.40903.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6FioXyMnhK=gKbwDeGpvGGz-xMs-Hr6c4q3SsTtJ29CRsqCQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, August 22, 2011 17:48:47 Anton Staaf wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Anton Staaf wrote:
> >> Currently, if a device read request is done that does not begin or end
> >> on a sector boundary a stack allocated bounce buffer is used to perform
> >> the read, and then just the part of the sector that is needed is copied
> >> into the users buffer. This stack allocation can mean that the bounce
> >> buffer will not be aligned to the dcache line size. This is a problem
> >> when caches are enabled because unaligned cache invalidates are not
> >> safe.
> >>
> >> This patch allocates a cache line size aligned sector sized bounce
> >> buffer the first time that ext2fs_devread is called.
> >
> > ...and never frees ist, which is a bad thing. Please fix.
>
> That was actually intentional. To free the buffer the code would need
> to know when it was done doing ext2 accesses. This information isn't
> really available. And it would be a performance hit to allocate and
> free the buffer every time a read was performed, instead this patch
> re-uses the same allocated buffer every time that the read is called.
> Would you prefer that I allocate and free the buffer each time? I can
> see an argument for that since it would mean that the code could also
> be called from multiple threads simultaneously, not that we have any
> such thing to worry about at the moment.
i'm not sure i follow ... the current code always frees it upon func exit.
why cant yours do the same ?
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110823/f3a88785/attachment.pgp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-23 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-22 20:12 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ext2: Cache line aligned partial sector bounce buffer Anton Staaf
2011-08-22 21:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-08-22 21:48 ` Anton Staaf
2011-08-23 17:23 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2011-08-23 17:58 ` Anton Staaf
2011-08-23 18:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-23 18:48 ` Anton Staaf
2011-08-23 18:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-23 18:57 ` Anton Staaf
2011-08-23 20:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-08-23 20:24 ` Anton Staaf
2011-08-23 18:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-08-23 18:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-23 18:52 ` Anton Staaf
2011-08-23 20:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108231323.40903.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox