From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 05:19:55 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] DM9000: change some printf to use debug
	instead
In-Reply-To: <683E266C-CDFB-4310-8145-1926C6FCCBD8@armadeus.org>
References: <20110810200828.21204.60050.stgit@shuttle2.etheralp.ch>
	<20110824202056.71C1211F9E78@gemini.denx.de>
	<683E266C-CDFB-4310-8145-1926C6FCCBD8@armadeus.org>
Message-ID: <201108250519.55535.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Thursday, August 25, 2011 01:04:17 AM Eric Jarrige wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang,
> 
> On 24 ao?t 2011, at 22:20, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Eric Jarrige,
> > 
> > In message <2B613989-ADDB-43D6-A8C3-A30D5245262A@armadeus.org> you wrote:
> >>>> I'am just wondering: I see that DM9000_DBG is used all over dm9000
> >>>> code - do you know the reason why not just use debug()?
> >> 
> >> dm9000 does not use debug() at all.
> >> That's the reason to fix the printf issues as a first priority by using
> >> the DM9000_DBG.
> > 
> > NAK.
> > 
> > If you touch that, then please do it right: us debug() instead, and
> > remove DM9000_DBG.  Thanks.
> 
> Do you mean both changes in one patch?

My wild guess would be to FIRST fix the DM9000_DBG and NEXT convert these 
printf()s to debug()s.

Cheers

> 
> Best regards,
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot