From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:53:40 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PULL] U-Boot PXA
In-Reply-To: <20110828205533.4DEEF18C46F5@gemini.denx.de>
References: <201108280639.56242.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<201108282049.02428.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<20110828205533.4DEEF18C46F5@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <201108282353.40481.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Sunday, August 28, 2011 10:55:33 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Marek Vasut,
> 
> In message <201108282049.02428.marek.vasut@gmail.com> you wrote:
> > > Again, what a mess... Why are you selecting just 3 commits from a 6
> > > patches series?  This makes no sense.
> > 
> > Because Albert wanted me to send a pull rq with the PXA fixes. I don't
> > know if he hand-picked them already or not, but if not, here's a pull
> > request.
> 
> I think you did not understand what I mean.
> 
> My question was why (1) you send a patch series which is obviously
> not really a set of patches that depend on each other (these should
> be submitted as separate patches then), and

Ok, I get what you mean.

> (2) why you did not
> inclyde the 4th PXA related patch into the pull request.

Because that's really something I want to be tested properly. I want to avoid 
breakage.

Cheers

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk