[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] net: ll_temac: Add LL TEMAC driver to u-boot

[Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>]

Dear Michal Simek,

In message <4E647722.9080602@monstr.eu> you wrote:
> 
> > I can only offer you a solution that seems acceptable to me.
> 
> seems?

Well, yes.  As mentioned, I'm not happy with the propsal myself, but
as long as I cannot come up with any better one it would be unjust to
demand it from you.

> >>   This obviously doesn't mix well.  If there is no better way
> >>> of doing this, I'd still prefer deriving the index from the offset in
> >>> a struct than deriving the address from an offset - the intention is
> >>> to enable the compiler to perform type checking, which is impossible
> >>> with a typeless base+offset address.
> >> I understand the reasons for that but I can't see any elegant way how to do so.
> > 
> > Well, I just proposed one way - not elegant indeed, but I'd be willing
> > to swallow that.
> 
> You mean that array of structs, right?

No. I mean the text above: I'd rather derive the index from the
offset in a struct instead of deriving the address from an offset
(but I have to admit that I don't see an elegant way to implement this
yet).


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Why can you only have two doors on a chicken coop? If it had four  it
would be a chicken sedan.