public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] NAND: Add scrub.quiet command option
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:36:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109122036.27758.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E6E4FF0.10707@freescale.com>

On Monday, September 12, 2011 08:31:12 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/12/2011 01:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, September 12, 2011 08:06:27 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 09/12/2011 12:45 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Monday, September 12, 2011 06:45:43 PM Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>>> On Monday, September 12, 2011 00:04:10 Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>> This allows the scrub command to scrub without asking the user if he
> >>>>> really wants to scrub the area. Useful in scripts.
> >>>> 
> >>>> "quiet" and "skip user input" are two different things.  can you use a
> >>>> more clean option like accepting "-y" to the "scrub" subcommand ?
> >>> 
> >>> I'd prefer to have this hidden from common users as much as possible.
> >> 
> >> What's the use case for needing to script this, BTW?
> > 
> > Update a block in NAND that's not handled by BCH accelerator in the MX28
> > chip.
> > 
> > The problem is, block 0 has it's own ECC done by bootrom software. That
> > kind of ECC is incompatible with BCH-produced ECC. That's also a reason
> > for needing that write.raw command.
> > 
> > Now, if you try erasing that block, the BCH reads and writes some of it's
> > metadata there. Obviously, since there is different kind of ECC, the
> > metadata aren't there and it chokes, claiming the block is bad and
> > refuses to erase it.
> > 
> > And before you ask why -- that's because the BCH accelerator puts the
> > metadata at random places in the block (every 512 bytes, it puts a few
> > bytes of it's ECC) instead of putting them only to the ECC area. On the
> > other hand, the bootrom ECC puts the whole ECC at offset (1024 + 12)
> > bytes from the start of the block 0.
> 
> Would it make sense to have the driver code treat block 0 specially
> (possibly conditioned on an hwconfig or compile-time config), rather
> than have it be user-driven?

No! What if (very possible situation actually) the user wants to use the whole 
NAND because the user is booting from SD/SPI/... ?

> 
> I'm curious why anything is written on an erase, though, regardless of
> data format.

Badblock markers (some FSL invention) are written always.

> 
> -Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-12 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-12  4:04 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Random NAND fixes and improvements Marek Vasut
2011-09-12  4:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] NAND: Really ignore bad blocks when scrubbing Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 18:54   ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12  4:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] NAND: Add nand read.raw and write.raw commands Marek Vasut
2011-09-21 18:48   ` Scott Wood
2011-09-22  1:55   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 V2] " Marek Vasut
2011-09-22 16:03     ` Scott Wood
2011-09-22 18:36     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 V3] " Marek Vasut
2011-09-22 18:40       ` Scott Wood
2011-09-23 13:43       ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 V4] " Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 18:57         ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12  4:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation Marek Vasut
2011-09-21 18:50   ` Scott Wood
2011-09-21 19:49     ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-21 19:55       ` Scott Wood
2011-09-21 20:16         ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-22  1:34           ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-22  7:41           ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-22  8:51             ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-23 17:35               ` Scott Wood
2011-09-24 12:37                 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-26 18:33                   ` Scott Wood
2011-09-26 18:49                     ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12  4:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] NAND: Make page, erase, oob size available via cmd_nand Marek Vasut
2011-09-21 18:55   ` Scott Wood
2011-09-21 19:52     ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-22  1:57   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 V2] " Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 19:01     ` Scott Wood
2011-09-27 19:38       ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 19:51         ` Scott Wood
2011-09-27 20:07           ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 20:53             ` Scott Wood
2011-09-27 21:04               ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-27 21:14     ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12  4:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] NAND: Add scrub.quiet command option Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 16:45   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-12 17:45     ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 18:06       ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 18:24         ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 18:31           ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 18:36             ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2011-09-12 19:19               ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 19:28                 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 19:36                   ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 19:42                     ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 23:24                       ` Scott Wood
2011-09-13  1:02                         ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-13  4:25                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-13  4:36                             ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-13 22:22                           ` Scott Wood
2011-09-13 22:41                             ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-13 22:53                               ` Scott Wood
2011-09-12 18:37       ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-12 18:50         ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12 20:33       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-12 22:59         ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-13 22:20   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] NAND: Add -y option to nand scrub command Marek Vasut
2011-09-13 22:28     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-27 19:03     ` Scott Wood
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-08 20:39 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] Random NAND fixes and improvements Marek Vasut
2011-09-08 20:39 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] NAND: Add scrub.quiet command option Marek Vasut
2011-09-09 15:39   ` Detlev Zundel
2011-09-10 20:54     ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-12  9:49       ` Detlev Zundel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201109122036.27758.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox