From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] serial ifdef mess
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:44:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109200044.31961.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ0hSsbvAH_5EEDBn5R92mPJCibOi-iWBz=neL8GVVwXFA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 00:28:30 Simon Glass wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> > a) Use a particular serial driver directly - perfect if you have only one
> > serial port (or don't care about the others)
>
> Do we really want this? Is the code overhead of SERIAL_MULTI so bad
> that people insist on not defining it? If so, can we reduce that code
> overhead? It doesn't seem like it should be large. Perhaps non-MULTI
> could be implemented by macros and inline functions in the header
> file?
MULTI: serial_puts looks up a struct in a linked list to find the device
before calling the func pointer in that struct to the device-specific
serial_puts
!MULTI: serial_puts writes char to hardware register
the latter sounds a lot more robust to me :). it might not be a recommended
or default setting, but i think we should strive to keep that simplicity
around.
> > b) Use the SERIAL_MULTI 'management layer' and 'register' each relavent
> > serial port on the board. The board will need to define a (probably
> > hard-coded) a default to handle I/O until the environment can be read
> > and the hardware initialised to actually make the serial ports
> > operational.
>
> Prior to relocation there is a single console UART. I wonder whether
> it would be acceptable to buffer all output until after relocation?
> Serial init is the one peripheral still needed prior to reloc. At
> least this could be the default option, with something like
> CONFIG_EARLY_UART defined to revert to current behavior for debugging
> reasons.
as a debugging tool, any buffer is not interesting. after that, it might be.
> But to truly deal with your point, I don't think the environment tells
> the serial ports much. They get their registers address and settings
> from other places (normally hard-coded in the driver, perhaps in
> future through an fdt). It should be possible for any serial driver to
> output things before the env is loaded. To implement an early UART we
> simply need the serial layer to pass serial calls straight onto the
> selected driver without going through the mux or anything else that
> needs state. That bit already works...
!MULTI gives us a working early UART now. i know because the Blackfin port
can output info to the serial port at pretty much power on.
> The main bugbear for me is that there is no handle passed to the
> serial functions. All of the serial devices should have an extra
> parameter at the start which is perhaps struct seral_device *, and
> that structure should have a ->priv member, pointing to a
> driver-specific structure which we can
> use to store things like the port number / register address. So in
> other words make it like most other driver layers in U-Boot.
yes, this would be the first thing i'd fix
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20110920/e0ccf1e3/attachment.pgp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-20 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-18 5:17 [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets Mike Frysinger
2011-09-18 7:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-18 8:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-18 13:08 ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-19 4:59 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-19 5:10 ` Marek Vasut
2011-09-19 5:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-19 6:57 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-19 5:11 ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-19 5:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-19 6:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-19 14:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-19 18:29 ` Scott Wood
2011-09-19 20:57 ` [U-Boot] serial ifdef mess Mike Frysinger
2011-09-20 0:41 ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-20 0:52 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-20 1:07 ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-20 4:28 ` Simon Glass
2011-09-20 4:44 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2011-09-20 5:12 ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-20 7:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-20 4:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-13 16:54 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] punt unused clean/distclean targets Mike Frysinger
2011-10-15 20:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201109200044.31961.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox