[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] arm: provide a CONFIG flag for disabling relocation

[Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>]

Dear "GROYER, Anthony",

In message <BC0A2F434D4F39448D24A68EA6EFFB9F0194D534@EU-FR-EXBE07.eu.corp.airliquide.com> you wrote:
> 
> The use of the initial patches for the CONFIG_SYS_SKIP_ARM_RELOCATION featu
> res has revealed two issues.

Could you please restict your line length to some 70 characters or so?
Thanks.

> First issue: the calculation of the relocation offset was done only if the
> relocation is actually done. So we could reach a point where r9 has a wrong
>  value, since it has never been used before (in my case, this bug happens w

This is a configuration error then, isn't it?  The relocation offset
should be either the intended value, or eventually zero, if no
relocation is intended.

>  the test of a relocation need.
> 
> Second issue: board_init_r was thinking the memory area for the malloc is j
> ust below the code, whereas the board_init_f had allocated some space for t
> he malloc at the end of the SDRAM. If the code is located at the base of th

This is a broken memory layout then, i. e. another configuration
error.


So actually both your "issues" are caused by configuration errors and
should go away if you fix your system configuration.


BTW:  your patch has a number ofd coduing style errors, and the
Signed-off-by: line is missing.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
                                                   - Arthur C. Clarke