From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 03:34:30 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation
In-Reply-To: <20110921201635.3FD24140796D@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1315800250-19761-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<4E7A4145.30501@freescale.com>
	<20110921201635.3FD24140796D@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <201109220334.31386.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:16:35 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stefano & Marek,
> 
> can you please provide the requested information?
> 
> In message <4E7A4145.30501@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote:
> > > In message <4E7A320D.1030002@freescale.com> you wrote:
> > >> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux?  It would be nice if
> > >> we could keep this code in sync.
> > > 
> > > Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board,
> > > so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too.
> > 
> > How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS?
> > 
> > I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have an
> > explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Wolfgang Denk

This patch is actually optional and right now isn't used by M28. Though someone 
might find this helpful.

Cheers